...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Pathologies of power: rethinking health and human rights.
【24h】

Pathologies of power: rethinking health and human rights.

机译:权力的病理:重新思考健康与人权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The field of health and human rights has grown quickly, but its boundaries have yet to be traced. Fifty-one years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, consensus regarding the most promising directions for the future is lacking; however, outcome-oriented assessments lead us to question approaches that rely solely on recourse to formal legal and civil rights. Similarly unpromising are approaches that rely overmuch on appeals to governments: careful study reveals that state power has been responsible for most human rights violations and that most violations are embedded in "structural violence"--social and economic inequities that determine who will be at risk for assaults and who will be shielded. This article advances an agenda for research and action grounded in the struggle for social and economic rights, an agenda suited to public health and medicine, whose central contributions to future progress in human rights will be linked to the equitable distribution of the fruits of scientific advancement. Such an approach is in keeping with the Universal Declaration but runs counter to several of the reigning ideologies of public health, including those favoring efficacy over equity.
机译:健康和人权领域发展迅速,但其边界尚未追寻。在《世界人权宣言》发表五十一年之后,关于未来最有希望的方向缺乏共识;但是,以结果为导向的评估使我们质疑仅依靠正式法律和公民权利的方法。同样过分依赖于对政府的呼吁的做法是没有希望的:仔细的研究表明,国家权力是大多数侵犯人权行为的责任,并且大多数侵犯行为都根植于“结构性暴力”中-社会和经济不平等决定了谁将面临危险攻击,谁将被屏蔽。本文提出了一项以社会和经济权利斗争为基础的研究和行动议程,该议程适合公共卫生和医学,其对未来人权进步的主要贡献将与科学进步成果的公平分配联系在一起。这种做法符合《世界宣言》,但与一些流行的公共卫生意识形态背道而驰,包括那些主张效力高于公平的观念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号