...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >RE: 'AN OVERVIEW OF METHODS FOR MONITORING SOCIAL DISPARITIES IN CANCER WITHAN EXAMPLE USING TRENDS IN LUNG CANCER INCIDENCE BY AREA-SOCIOECONOMICPOSITION AND RACE-ETHNICITY, 1992-2004'
【24h】

RE: 'AN OVERVIEW OF METHODS FOR MONITORING SOCIAL DISPARITIES IN CANCER WITHAN EXAMPLE USING TRENDS IN LUNG CANCER INCIDENCE BY AREA-SOCIOECONOMICPOSITION AND RACE-ETHNICITY, 1992-2004'

机译:稀土:“通过区域-社会经济定位和种族种族监测肺癌社会差异的方法概述(以肺癌发生率趋势为例,1992-2004年)”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The appropriate measurement of ethnic disparities/ inequalities in health and disease is crucially important, not just for monitoring but also for choosing priorities for interventions. I would like to add to the debate that Harper et al. (1) and Messer (2) have started, not least to offer a European perspective.Our modern-day, multiethnic world has set lofty goals of racial equality and-even more importantly, because they are not merely aspirations-ethical and just policies, that is, equity (3). Our goals, in the United States and Europe alike, are backed by legislation and national policy. These goals are immensely difficult to achieve, and the absence of both clarity in conceptual reasoning and high-quality data are twin obstacles, arguably making the task impossible. The underpinning questions of why we have set these goals, and the consequent health-care actions required, are as important as the technical questions of measurement (3).
机译:适当衡量健康和疾病中的种族差异/不平等现象至关重要,这不仅对于监测,而且对于选择干预措施的优先次序都至关重要。我想增加关于Harper等人的辩论。 (1)和Messer(2)已经开始,不仅是为了提供欧洲视角。我们当今的多种族世界设定了种族平等的崇高目标,甚至更重要的是,因为它们不仅是出于抱负和道德,而且是公正的政策。 ,即权益(3)。我们在美国和欧洲的目标都得到立法和国家政策的支持。这些目标非常难以实现,概念推理的缺乏清晰性和高质量数据都是双重障碍,可以说使这项任务无法实现。我们为什么要设定这些目标的基本问题以及随之而来的必需的医疗保健行动与测量的技术问题一样重要(3)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号