首页> 外文期刊>Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung >Do we need an epistemological discussion to assure forest science? - a critique to the seven theses and three questions about the sustainability of forest science by Oesten and von Detten (2006).
【24h】

Do we need an epistemological discussion to assure forest science? - a critique to the seven theses and three questions about the sustainability of forest science by Oesten and von Detten (2006).

机译:我们需要认识论的讨论来确保森林科学吗? -对Oesten和von Detten(2006)关于森林科学可持续性的七个论点和三个问题的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article critically discusses the recently published theses of Oesten und VON Detten (2006) about the sustainability of forest science. The present situation of forest science and its options for the future development are considered to be much better as forecasted by Oesten and von Detten. It is assumed that measures like targeted publications, reference to potential applications, directed media activities and networking are suitable tools to strengthen the standing of forest science at present and in the future.
机译:文章严格地讨论了Oesten und VON Detten(2006)最近发表的有关森林科学可持续性的论文。 Oesten和von Detten预测,森林科学的现状及其对未来发展的选择要好得多。可以认为,诸如有针对性的出版物,对潜在应用的引用,有针对性的媒体活动和联网等措施是增强当前和未来森林科学地位的合适工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号