首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Evaluation of GFR measurement method as an explanation for differences among GFR estimation equations.
【24h】

Evaluation of GFR measurement method as an explanation for differences among GFR estimation equations.

机译:评估GFR测量方法可解释GFR估算方程之间的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: The race-ethnicity coefficients (1.23 and 0.88) for using the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation in Chinese and Japanese populations are substantially different from each other despite similarities in food, lifestyle, and genetic background. We hypothesized that the different methods for measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR), namely plasma technetium-99m-labeled diethylenetri-amine penta-acetate (~(99m)Tc-DTPA) clearance (CDTPA) and inulin renal clearance (Cin) in the Chinese and Japanese studies, respectively, may have contributed to the observed difference in race-ethnicity coefficients. In this study, we compared CDTPA and Cin simultaneously.
机译:致编辑:尽管饮食,生活方式和遗传背景相似,但在中国和日本人群中使用原始的肾脏疾病饮食修改(MDRD)研究方程式所得出的种族种族系数(1.23和0.88)却存在很大差异。 。我们假设测量肾小球滤过率(mGFR)的不同方法,即血浆the 99m标记的二乙撑三胺五乙酸盐(〜(99m)Tc-DTPA)清除率(CDTPA)和菊粉肾清除率(Cin)中国和日本的研究可能分别导致了所观察到的种族民族系数差异。在这项研究中,我们同时比较了CDTPA和Cin。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号