...
首页> 外文期刊>臨床病理 >Evaluation of BD Vacutainer~R Barricor~(TM) Plasma Blood Collection Tube vs. Insepack~R II-D for Selected Diagnostic Tests: Clinical Significance of Differences in Patients on Hemodialysis
【24h】

Evaluation of BD Vacutainer~R Barricor~(TM) Plasma Blood Collection Tube vs. Insepack~R II-D for Selected Diagnostic Tests: Clinical Significance of Differences in Patients on Hemodialysis

机译:BD Vacutainer〜R路径〜(TM)等离子体血液收集管的评价对于所选诊断试验的insepack〜R II-D:血液透析患者患者差异的临床意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Poor separation of specimens and fibrin clot formation in serum for blood testing of patients on hemodialysis (HD) are significant problems in processing samples obtained after HD. This study aimed to explore whether the results obtained with plasma tubes are compatible with those from serum and to compare qual-ity between the two methods. The possibility of using plasma instead of serum for testing of post-HD specimens was evaluated at Tai-genkai Hospital, Japan, using the BD Vacutainer~R Barricor~(TM) Plasma Blood Collection Tube and Insepack~R II-D. After specimens from 50 outpatients had been dispensed into plasma and serum tubes (and coagulated for serum), these samples were centrifuged according to the instructions provided by the manufacturers. Subsequently, 33 chemistry and immunology analytes were measured in plasma and serum, using the TBA~(TM)-120FR analyzer.
机译:在血液透析患者(HD)血清中血清血清中标本和纤维蛋白凝块形成的不良分离是在高清后获得的处理样品中的显着问题。 该研究旨在探讨用血浆管获得的结果是否与来自血清的结果相容,并在两种方法之间比较Qual-Ity。 在日本Taigkai医院,使用BD Vacutainer〜R路障〜(TM)等离子收集管和insepack〜R II-D,评估使用血浆代替HD血清进行HD样本测试后的HD样本测试。 在从50个门诊患者的标本中分配到血浆和血清管中(并对血清凝固),这些样品根据制造商提供的说明书离心。 随后,使用TBA〜(TM)-120FR分析仪在血浆和血清中测量33种化学和免疫学分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号