首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of International Law >UN Security Council - counterterrorism sanctions - UN sanctions committees - judicial review - assets freezing - right to be heard
【24h】

UN Security Council - counterterrorism sanctions - UN sanctions committees - judicial review - assets freezing - right to be heard

机译:联合国安理会-反恐怖主义制裁-联合国制裁委员会-司法审查-资产冻结-陈述权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the joined cases brought by the European Commission (Commission), the United Kingdom, and the Council of the European Union (EU) against Yassin Abdullah Kadi, decided on July 18, 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ or Court) sustained the judgment of the General Court that had annulled the Commission regulation freezing Kadi's funds in accordance with the mandate of the United Nations Security Council's sanctions committee. The ECJ ruled that, although the majority of the reasons relied on by EU authorities for listing Kadi were sufficiently detailed and specific to allow him to exercise his rights of defense and judicial review effectively, no information or evidence had been produced to substantiate the allegations, when challenged by Kadi, that he had been involved in activities linked to international terrorism.
机译:在2013年7月18日欧洲委员会(委员会),英国和欧盟理事会针对Yassin Abdullah Kadi提出的共同诉讼中,欧洲联盟法院(ECJ法院)维持了普通法院的判决,该判决废除了委员会根据联合国安理会制裁委员会的任务授权冻结卡迪资金的规定。欧洲法院裁定,尽管欧盟当局将卡迪列入名单的大多数理由都足够详细和具体,足以使他有效地行使其辩护权和司法复议权,但仍未提供任何信息或证据来证实这些指控,当受到卡迪的挑战时,他曾参与与国际恐怖主义有关的活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号