...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of International Law >SOVEREIGNTY-MODERN: A NEW APPROACH TO AN OUTDATED CONCEPT
【24h】

SOVEREIGNTY-MODERN: A NEW APPROACH TO AN OUTDATED CONCEPT

机译:主权现代:一种过时概念的新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although much criticized, the concept of "sovereignty" is still central to most thinking about international relations and particularly international law. The old "Westphalian" concept in the context of a nation-state's "right" to monopolize certain exercises of power with respect to its territory and citizens has been discredited in many ways (as discussed below), but it is still prized and harbored by those who maintain certain "realist" views or who otherwise wish to prevent (sometimes with justification) foreign or international powers and authorities from interfering in a national government's decisions and activities. Furthermore, when one begins to analyze and disaggregate the concept of sovereignty, it quickly becomes apparent that it has many dimensions. Often, however, the term "sovereignty" is invoked in a context or manner designed to avoid and prevent analysis, sometimes with an advocate's intent to fend off criticism or justifications for international "infringements" on the activities of a nation-state or its internal stakeholders and power operators.
机译:尽管受到了很多批评,但“主权”的概念对于大多数有关国际关系,特别是国际法的思考仍然是核心。在民族国家垄断其领土和公民的某些权力行使的“权利”的背景下,旧的“威斯特伐利亚式”概念在许多方面已被抹黑(如下所述),但仍然受到珍视和保留持有某些“现实”观点或希望防止(有时有理由)外国或国际权力和机构干预国家政府的决定和活动的人。此外,当人们开始分析和分解主权概念时,很快就会发现它具有许多方面。但是,“主权”一词通常是在旨在避免和防止分析的环境或方式下被援引的,有时倡导者的目的是抵制对民族国家或其内部活动的国际“侵权”的批评或辩护。利益相关者和电力运营商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号