首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Law Report >Revision of the 'Materiality to Patentability' Standard for the Duty to Disclose Information in Patent Applications [EXCERPTS]
【24h】

Revision of the 'Materiality to Patentability' Standard for the Duty to Disclose Information in Patent Applications [EXCERPTS]

机译:修订专利申请中信息披露义务的“专利性原则” [EXCERPTS]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office or PTO) is proposing to revise the standard for materiality for the duty to disclose information in patent applications and reexamination proceedings in light of the decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit or Court) in Therasense, Inc v Bec-ton, Dickinson & Co, Specifically, the Office is proposing to revise the materiality standard for the duty to disclose to match the materiality standard, as defined in Therasense, for the inequitable conduct doctrine. While Therasense does not require the Office to harmonize the materiality standards underlying the duty of disclosure and the inequitable conduct doctrine, the Office believes that there are important reasonsto do so. The materiality standard set forth in Therasense should reduce the frequency with which applicants and practitioners are being charged with inequitable conduct, consequently reducing the incentive to submit information disclosure statements containing marginally relevant information and enabling applicants to be more forthcoming and helpful to the Office. At the same time, it should also continue to prevent fraud on the Office and other egregious forms of misconduct. Additionally, harmonization of the materiality standards is simpler for the patent system as a whole.
机译:美国专利商标局(Office或PTO)提议根据美国联邦巡回上诉法院(Federal Circuit)的决定,修改在专利申请和复审程序中公开信息义务的重要性标准。法院在Therasense,Inc诉Becton,Dickinson&Co中提起诉讼,特别是,该办公室提议修订重要性标准,以披露与不道德行为学说相匹配的,与Therasense中定义的重要性标准相匹配的义务。尽管Therasense不需要劳工局协调披露义务和不公正行为学说所依据的重要性标准,但劳工局认为这样做的重要原因。 Therasense中规定的重要性标准应减少申请人和从业人员被指控犯有不公正行为的频率,从而减少了提交包含少量相关信息的信息披露声明的动机,并使申请人能够更加积极主动地为办公室提供帮助。同时,它也应继续防止该局欺诈和其他严重形式的不当行为。此外,对于整个专利制度而言,统一重要性标准更为简单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号