首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Law Report >Patentability and maximum protection of intellectual property in proteomics and genomics
【24h】

Patentability and maximum protection of intellectual property in proteomics and genomics

机译:蛋白质组学和基因组学的可专利性和最大程度的知识产权保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The patenting of inventions in the fields of proteomics and genomics has been prolific in the last few years and will continue in that vein for some more years. The ingenuity by which inventions can be claimed increases, so that even computerized methods for finding useful drugs based on the underlying genomic and proteomic information find their way into patents. However, the illicit users of those patens are starting to whittle away at their value. First, it may be hard to find those who improperly practice the claimed invention. Second, violators may practice in areas of the world where there is no patent protection. Third, the practice may be held by a court not to be infringing activity because it has as its aim the development of a new drug.Finally, the claims may be held invalid for lack of written description or enablement as the courts find mechanisms or reasons to narrow the allowable claims. With this setting, we must consider what can be done to best protect this new generation of inventive activity. Moreover, we must consider the possible demise of the drug pipeline should this trend to narrow protection continue.
机译:在过去的几年中,蛋白质组学和基因组学领域的发明获得了专利,并且将继续保持这种状态。可以要求发明的创造力提高了,因此,即使是基于潜在的基因组和蛋白质组学信息的计算机化方法来寻找有用的药物,也都可以申请专利。但是,这些专利的非法使用者开始贬低其价值。首先,可能很难找到那些不正确地实践所要求保护的发明的人。其次,违规者可能在世界上没有专利保护的地区执业。第三,法院可以将这种做法视为不侵权活动,因为它的目的是开发新药。最后,由于法院找到了机制或理由,缺乏书面说明或授权,使主张无效。缩小可允许的索赔范围。在这种情况下,我们必须考虑可以采取什么措施来最好地保护这一新一代的发明活动。此外,如果这种缩小保护范围的趋势继续下去,我们必须考虑毒品管道可能消亡的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号