...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of psychiatry >Dr. Perlis and Colleagues Reply
【24h】

Dr. Perlis and Colleagues Reply

机译:佩利斯博士和同事回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To the Editor: We thank Dr. Montgomery for highlighting the important work of his group. As he is well aware, compiling and abstracting clinical trials requires numerous assumptions about study outcome. Likewise, the analyses of association between funding source and outcome require further assumptions, most notably that competing interests are reported consistently. Other issues are more subtle: Should any author with a competing interest or only the first author be considered? Does any kind of support, such as free medication, confer the same risk? Published studies vary somewhat in their application of these definitions.
机译:致编辑:感谢蒙哥马利博士强调他的小组的重要工作。如他所知,编译和抽象临床试验需要关于研究结果的许多假设。同样,对资金来源与结果之间关联的分析还需要进一步的假设,最值得注意的是,利益冲突的报告是一致的。其他问题则更加微妙:是否应该考虑任何具有竞争利益的作者或仅考虑第一作者?诸如免费药物之类的任何支持都会带来相同的风险吗?已发表的研究在应用这些定义方面有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号