首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Comparison of day rehabilitation to skilled nursing facility for the rehabilitation for total knee arthroplasty
【24h】

Comparison of day rehabilitation to skilled nursing facility for the rehabilitation for total knee arthroplasty

机译:日间康复与熟练护理机构进行全膝关节置换康复的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Day rehabilitation (DR) is emerging in the United States as an alternative postacute rehabilitation setting. There have been no published studies focused on the efficacy of DR for a postacute orthopedic population. This study investigated the efficacy of DR as an alternative to inpatient skilled nursing facility (SNF) status post total knee arthroplasty. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted. Subjects were 50-75 yrs old, underwent total knee arthroplasty in 2009, and were discharged from an SNF or DR affiliated with a postacute healthcare system. The sample consisted of all DR (n = 56) and randomly selected SNF (n = 45) subjects. RESULTS: Upon admission, there were no differences between DR and SNF groups for age, sex, comorbidity score, pain score, knee range of motion, ambulation distance, locomotion Functional Independent Measure score, or body mass index. Upon discharge, there was no difference in knee range of motion or pain between groups. Discharge ambulation distance (P = 0.000) and locomotion Functional Independent Measure score (P = 0.001) were greater for the DR compared with the SNF group. Cost was lower (P = 0.000) and length of stay was shorter (P = 0.000) for the DR compared with the SNF group. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects discharged from DR had similar or improved outcomes compared with subjects discharged from SNF at a lower cost and shorter stay. Results suggest that DR delivered significant cost savings when compared with SNF without compromising patient outcomes.
机译:目的:日间康复(DR)正在美国作为一种替代的急性后康复环境而出现。尚未有针对DR对急性骨科人群的疗效的已发表研究。本研究调查了DR替代全膝关节置换术后住院熟练护理设施(SNF)状态的功效。设计:进行回顾性图表审查。受试者年龄在50-75岁之间,2009年进行了全膝关节置换术,并从与急性后医疗保健系统相关的SNF或DR出院。该样本由所有DR(n = 56)和随机选择的SNF(n = 45)受试者组成。结果:入院后,DR和SNF组之间在年龄,性别,合并症评分,疼痛评分,膝关节活动范围,步行距离,运动功能独立性评分或体重指数方面无差异。出院时,两组之间的膝关节活动范围或疼痛程度无差异。与SNF组相比,DR的出行行走距离(P = 0.000)和运动功能独立测量评分(P = 0.001)更大。与SNF组相比,DR的费用较低(P = 0.000),住院时间较短(P = 0.000)。结论:与从SNF出院的受试者相比,从DR出院的受试者具有相似或改善的结果,且费用较低且住院时间较短。结果表明,与SNF相比,DR可节省大量成本,而不会影响患者的治疗效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号