...
首页> 外文期刊>日本家畜管理学会誌 >An evaluation of round bale silage
【24h】

An evaluation of round bale silage

机译:圆形捆丝青贮饲料的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Round bale silage made of wilted Italian ryegrass (60% moisture) was compared with a conventional high moisture (90%) silage ensiled in a trench silo for fermentation quality, nutritive value, loss during silage making, production cost and animal performance. The fermentation quality of the bale silage was higher than that of the conventional silage. Content of neutral detergent fiber and in vitro digestibility by rumen microbes were not greatly different between the two silages. The conventional silage had a large dry matter loss (29%) during silage making compared with the bale silage (8%). In total production cost, the bale silage resulted in approximately 23yen/DM less than the conventional silage. Although dry matter intake of the bale silage by heifers was higher than that of conventional silage, rate of live weight gain and feed efficiency were similar for the two silages.
机译:与枯萎的意大利黑麦草(60%水分)进行的圆形捆包青贮饲料与传统的高水分(90%)混合在沟槽筒仓中进行进行比较,用于发酵质量,营养价值,在青贮制作期间,生产成本和动物性能。 捆包青贮饲料的发酵质量高于常规青贮饲料。 中性洗涤剂纤维的含量和瘤胃微生物的体外消化率在两种青贮之间不会大大差异。 与捆包青贮组织(8%)相比,常规青贮饲料在青贮饲料中具有大的干物质损失(29%)。 总生产成本总的来说,捆包青贮饲料导致约23℃小于常规青贮饲料。 虽然小母牛的干物质摄入捆丝器的干物质较高于常规青贮饲料,但两种青贮饲料的活力增益率和饲料效率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号