...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: Are patients making an informed decision?
【24h】

Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: Are patients making an informed decision?

机译:分娩与重复剖宫产的试验:患者是否做出了明智的决定?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Most women eligible for a trial of labor after a cesarean (TOLAC) undergo an elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS). We hypothesized that this is largely because of poor patient education. Study Design: This was a prospective study of women who presented to our hospital from November 2010 through July 2011 who were candidates for TOLAC. Women filled out a questionnaire prior to their scheduled ERCS or upon admission for TOLAC. A χ 2 and a Student t test were used, as appropriate. Results: The study included 155 women, 87 for TOLAC and 68 for ERCS. Women in both groups demonstrated a lack of knowledge on the risks and benefits of TOLAC and ERCS. When patients perceived their providers as having a preference for ERCS, very few chose TOLAC, whereas the majority chose TOLAC if this was their provider's preference. Conclusion: Candidates for TOLAC appear to know little about the risks and benefits associated with their mode of delivery, and provider preference affects this choice.
机译:目的:大多数有资格在剖宫产后进行分娩试验的妇女进行选择性重复剖宫产(ERCS)。我们假设这主要是由于患者的教育程度差。研究设计:这是一项对前瞻性研究,研究对象为2010年11月至2011年7月在我院就诊的女性,她们是TOLAC的候选人。妇女在预定的ERCS或入学TOLAC之前填写了调查表。适当地使用χ2和Student t检验。结果:该研究包括155名妇女,其中87名是TOLAC妇女,而68名是ERCS妇女。两组中的妇女都表现出对TOLAC和ERCS的风险和益处缺乏了解。当患者认为其提供者偏爱ERCS时,很少选择TOLAC,而如果这是他们提供者的偏好,则大多数人选择TOLAC。结论:TOLAC的候选人似乎对其交付模式相关的风险和收益了解甚少,而提供商的偏好会影响这一选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号