首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Perinatology >Comparison of two national guidelines in obstetrics: American versus royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists.
【24h】

Comparison of two national guidelines in obstetrics: American versus royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists.

机译:比较两个国家的妇产科指南:美国妇产科学院和皇家妇科学院。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the obstetric guidelines published by the American College of Obstetrics And Gynecology (ACOG) and Royal Colleges of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The references and the recommendations in the current practice bulletins (PBs) and green guidelines (GGs) were compared. As of December 2007, there were 42 PBs and 27 GGs. There were nine common obstetric topics between ACOG and RCOG. Each GG had almost twice as many recommendations as the corresponding PB (median 7 versus 15; P < 0.0001); 28% of ACOG's recommendations were confirmed by RCOG and 16% disagreed. Recommendations of the common obstetric guidelines by ACOG and RCOG were not comparable the majority of the time.
机译:我们比较了美国妇产科学院(ACOG)和皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)发布的产科指南。比较了当前实践公告(PB)和绿色指南(GGs)中的参考和建议。截至2007年12月,共有42个PB和27个GG。 ACOG和RCOG之间有九个常见的产科主题。每个GG的建议几乎是相应PB的两倍(中位数7对15; P <0.0001); RCOG确认了ACOG建议的28%,但不同意16%。 ACOG和RCOG对通用产科指南的建议在大多数情况下不具有可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号