...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Improving Patients' Choice of Clinician by Including Roll-up Measures in Public Healthcare Quality Reports: an Online Experiment
【24h】

Improving Patients' Choice of Clinician by Including Roll-up Measures in Public Healthcare Quality Reports: an Online Experiment

机译:通过包括公共医疗保健质量报告中的卷起措施,改善患者的临床医生选择:在线实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundPublic reports on healthcare quality typically include complex data. To lower the cognitive burden of interpreting these data, some report designers create summary, or roll-up, measures combining multiple indicators of quality into one score. Little is known about how the availability of roll-ups affects clinician choice.ObjectiveTo determine how presenting quality scores at different levels of aggregation affects patients' clinician choices.DesignWe conducted a simulated clinician-choice experiment, randomizing participants to three versions of a public reporting website and comparing their clinician choices. One version aggregated all clinician-level quality measures into roll-ups, the second provided disaggregated (drill-down) scores only, and the third offered both roll-ups and drill-downs.ParticipantsFive hundred fifty panelists drawn from a probability-based Internet panel.Main MeasuresWe assessed the amount of effort participants exerted by tracking the length of time spent on the website and the number of concrete actions taken on the website (e.g., clicking items). We evaluated decision quality by measuring whether participants selected a clinician who performed more poorly than others and incongruence between participants' stated preferences for dimensions of quality and their chosen clinician's performance on those dimensions.Key ResultsParticipants seeing drill-downs alone (mean=14.9) or with roll-ups (mean=19.2) took more actions than those who saw roll-ups alone (mean=10.5) (ps0.05). However, participants seeing only drill-downs made poorer choices than those who saw roll-ups alone or with drill-downs. More participants seeing drill-downs chose a clinician who was outperformed (36.3% versus 23.4% [roll-up] and 25.6% [drill-down + roll-up], ps0.05) and made choices incongruent with stated preferences (51.2% versus 45.6% [roll-up] and 47.5% [drill-down + roll-up], ps0.05). The distinction between roll-up and drill-down was somewhat stronger for sicker participants.ConclusionsOur results suggest that roll-ups in healthcare quality reports, alone or as a complement to drill-downs, can help patients make better decisions for themselves.
机译:背景文本报告医疗质量通常包括复杂数据。为了降低解释这些数据的认知负担,一些报告设计人员创建摘要或汇总,将多个质量指标组合成一个分数。众所周知,令人讨厌如何影响临床医生的选择.Objectiveto确定不同级别的质量评分如何影响患者的临床医生选择.Designwe进行了模拟的临床医生选择实验,随机化了参与者的公共报告的三个版本网站并比较他们的临床医生选择。一个版本将所有临床医生级质量措施汇总到卷起,第二个提供分解(钻取)分数,第三个提供的卷起和钻孔倒下。从基于概率的互联网绘制的ParticantsFipy百分之百的小组成员Mail.Main措施我们评估了通过跟踪网站上花费的时间长度和网站上采取的具体行动的数量(例如,点击项目)来评估努力的努力。我们通过衡量参与者选择的临床医生评估决策质量,这些临床医生比其他临床人员更差,参与者之间的偏好对质量维度的偏好以及他们所选择的临床医生在那些尺寸上的表现中.Key结果颗粒单独看到钻探(平均= 14.9)或卷起(平均= 19.2)比那些单独升起的人(平均= 10.5)(ps <0.05)。然而,参与者只看到钻取越来越差,而不是那些单独卷起或钻取的人。更多的参与者看到钻探的诊所选择了表现优于表现优于的临床医生(36.3%,[卷起]和25.6%[钻取+卷起],PS <0.05),并通过所述偏好做出不一致的选择(51.2%)与45.6%[卷起]和47.5%[钻取+卷起],ps <0.05)。卷起和钻孔之间的区别对于病人参与者来说有点较强.Conclusour结果表明,单独或作为钻头的补充,可以帮助患者为自己提供更好的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号