...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment and Open Repair for Renal Artery Aneurysms: A?Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis
【24h】

Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment and Open Repair for Renal Artery Aneurysms: A?Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis

机译:肾动脉动脉瘤血管内治疗和开放修复的结果:A?单中心回顾性比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Purpose To compare outcomes of endovascular repair and open repair in treatment of renal artery aneurysms (RAAs). Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis included 93 RAAs in 86 patients (56 women; mean age ± SD, 48.8 y ± 12.4) treated from January 2002 to December 2015. Endovascular group comprised 52 RAAs in 45 patients, and operative group comprised 41 RAAs in 41 patients; mean follow-up duration was 49.9 months. Operative variables and perioperative and follow-up outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results Endovascular group had shorter operative time (85.2 min vs 270.4 min; P P P P ?= .013) compared with operative group. In-hospital mortality was 0% in both groups. Overall complication rates did not differ between endovascular (22.2%) and operative (19.5%) groups ( P ?= .758). During follow-up, no deaths occurred in either group. Follow-up morbidity was 13.5% for endovascular group and 4.9% for operative group ( P ?= .106). There were no significant differences between groups in average percentage change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (?2.3% ± 12.2 vs??0.8% ± 12.4; P ?= .538), systolic blood pressure (1.7% ± 10 vs??1.6% ± 8.3; P ?= .207), and diastolic blood pressure (?0.2% ± 9.7 vs??1.2% ± 10.4; P ?= .741). Conclusions Endovascular repair and open repair of RAA had similar favorable perioperative and midterm outcomes, but endovascular repair had shorter operative time, ICU stay, hospitalization time, and less estimated blood loss.
机译:摘要目的,用于比较腹血管修复和开放修复治疗肾动脉动脉瘤(RAAS)的蛋白质。材料和方法回顾性分析包括从2002年1月至2015年12月治疗的86名患者(56名妇女的Raas(56名妇女;平均年龄±12.4)。血管内组织45名患者中的52名Raas,41名患者组成41名raas耐心;平均随访时间为49.9个月。在2组之间比较了手术变量和围手术期和随访结果。结果血管内血管血管基团的操作时间较短(85.2分钟与270.4分钟; p p p p?= .013)与手术组相比。两组的医院死亡率为0%。血管内(22.2%)和手术(19.5%)组之间的整体并发症率没有差异(P?= .758)。在随访期间,任何一个组都没有发生死亡。血管内的后续发病率为13.5%,操作组4.9%(P?= .106)。估计肾小球过滤速率平均百分比变化没有显着差异(?2.3%±12.2 Vs ?? 0.8%±12.4; p?= .538),收缩压(1.7%±10 Vs ?? 1.6% ±8.3; p?= .207)和舒张压(Δ0.2%±9.7 Vs ?? 1.2%±10.4; p?= .741)。结论RAA的血管内修复和开放修复具有相似的围手术期和中期结果,但血管内修复较短的手术时间,ICU停留,住院时间和估计损失较少。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

    Department of Vascular Surgery Changhai Hospital Second Military Medical University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 放射医学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号