首页> 外文期刊>Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation >Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction and Loudness
【24h】

Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction and Loudness

机译:耳语和发声:空气动力学比较跨越内存和响度

获取原文
       

摘要

Summary Introduction Whisper is known to be produced by different speakers differently, especially with respect to glottal configuration that influences glottal aerodynamics. Differences in whisper production and phonation types imply important linguistic information in many languages, are identified in vocal pathologies, are used to communicate mood and emotion, and are used in vocal performance. Objective The present study focused on investigating the aerodynamic differences between whisper and phonation at different loudness and adduction levels. Methods Three men and five women between 20 and 40 years of age participated in the study. Smooth syllable strings of the syllable /baep:/ were whispered and phonated at three different loudness levels (soft, medium, and loud) and three voice qualities (breathy, normal, and pressed). The voice qualities are associated with different adduction levels. This resulted in 18 treatment combinations (three adduction levels ?three loudness levels ?two sexes). Results A regression analysis was performed using a PROC MIXED procedure with SAS statistical software. Under similar production conditions, subglottal pressure was significantly lower in whisper than in phonation in 10 of 18 combinations, mean glottal airflow was significantly higher in whisper than in phonation in 13 of 18 combinations, and flow resistance was significantly lower in whisper than in phonation in 14 of 18 combinations, with the female subjects demonstrating these trends more frequently than the male subjects do. Of importance, in general, compared with phonation under similar production conditions, whisper is not always accompanied by lower subglottal pressure and higher airflows. Conclusion Results from this study suggest that the typical finding of lower subglottal pressure, higher glottal airflow, and decreased flow resistance in whisper compared with phonation cannot be generalized to all individuals and depends on the whisper type. The nine basic production conditions (three loudness levels and three adduction levels) resulted in data that may help explain the wide range of variation of whisper production reported in earlier studies.
机译:发明内容众所周知,耳语被不同的扬声器以不同的方式产生,特别是关于影响所引人注目的空气动力学的声门配置。耳语生产和发声类型的差异意味着许多语言中的重要语言信息,在声道病理中识别,用于传达情绪和情绪,并用于声乐性能。目的本研究侧重于调查不同响度和内进水平的耳语与发声之间的空气动力学差异。方法三名男子和五名女性在20至40岁之间参加了该研究。音节/ baep的平滑音节字符串:/被低语,并在三个不同的响度水平(柔和,中等,响亮)和三个语音素质(呼吸,正常和按压)下发放。语音素质与不同的内容水平相关联。这导致了18种治疗组合(三个内容水平?三个响度水平?两种性别)。结果使用具有SAS统计软件的Proc混合过程进行回归分析。在类似的生产条件下,耳语中的子凝块压力显着低于18个组合中的10个耳语,在18个组合中的13个组合中的耳语中的耳语的平均光泽度显着高,并且耳语中的流动阻力显着低于放电14个中的14个组合,女性受试者比男性受试者更频繁地展示这些趋势。重要的是,一般来说,与相似的生产条件下的发声相比,耳语并不总是伴随较低的脱底压力和更高的气流。结论来自本研究的结果表明,与发声相比,典型的下子凝块压力,较低的光栅气流,较高的耳语的流动阻力下降,不能通过所有个体推广并取决于耳语型。九个基本生产条件(三个响度水平和三个内容水平)导致数据可能有助于解释早期研究报告的耳语生产的广泛变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号