...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of trauma nursing: the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses >Comparing rural ground and air emergency medical services: a level I trauma center's experience.
【24h】

Comparing rural ground and air emergency medical services: a level I trauma center's experience.

机译:比较农村地面和空气应急医疗服务:我的Trauma中心的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We sought to compare differences in patients transported by ground and air emergency medical services directly from the scenes of their injuries to a rural level I trauma facility. Variables examined included age, gender, vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale score, discharge location, length of stay, and survival metrics. Student t tests and odds ratios were used for analysis. Demographics and vital signs differed between trauma patients transported by air versus those transported by ground. Generally, length of stay was longer in air-transported patients, who also had poorer survival metrics with negligible risk of death. Significant differences exist in the markers of physiology such as vital signs, expected survival, and degree of injury.
机译:我们试图将由地面和空气应急医疗服务的患者直接从其伤害的患者转移到农村I级Trauma设施的患者的差异进行比较。 审查的变量包括年龄,性别,生命体征,格拉斯哥昏迷比分得分,放电定位,住宿时间和生存指标。 学生T测试和差距用于分析。 人口统计学和生命体征在空中运输的患者与地面运输的患者之间不同。 通常,空运患者的住宿时间更长,患者也具有较差的生存度量,具有可忽略的死亡风险。 生理标志性存在显着差异,如生命体征,预期存活率和损伤程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号