...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan >Comparisons of Four Methods for Tropical Cyclone Center Detection in a High-Resolution Simulation
【24h】

Comparisons of Four Methods for Tropical Cyclone Center Detection in a High-Resolution Simulation

机译:高分辨率模拟中热带旋风中心检测四种方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The tropical cyclone (TC) center position is often needed in the study of inner-core processes although there is currently no consensus on the definition of the TC center. While previous studies evaluated center-detecting methods in terms of the center position, vertical tilt and decomposed symmetric, and asymmetric circulations, this study used the 1-km resolution output of the predicted Hurricane Wihna (2005) at 5-minute intervals to evaluate the four TC centers that are frequently used in the diagnostic analysis of the inner-core dynamics processes: the pressure centroid center (PCC), the potential vorticity (PV) centroid center (PVC), the maximum tangential wind center (MTC), and the minimum pressure variance center (MVC) by focusing on the evolution of the small-scale track oscillation and vortex tilt.
机译:在内核过程的研究中通常需要热带气旋(TC)中心位置,尽管目前没有关于TC中心的定义的共识。 虽然先前的研究在中心位置,垂直倾斜和分解对称和不对称循环方面评估了中心检测方法,但是本研究使用了预测的飓风WIHNA(2005)的1公里分辨率输出,以5分钟的间隔来评估 常用于内核动力学过程的诊断分析的四个TC中心:压质心中心(PCC),潜在的涡度(PV)质心中心(PVC),最大切向风中心(MTC)和 通过专注于小规模轨道振荡和涡旋倾斜的演变,最小压力方差中心(MVC)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号