...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4‐point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars
【24h】

Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4‐point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars

机译:评估线性面部外科疤痕的患者和观察者瘢痕评估规模的可靠性和4分尺度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background In order to evaluate and improve aesthetic outcome for patients undergoing dermatological surgery, a reliable evaluation tool must be used. The 4‐point scale and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale ( POSAS ) were both developed for this purpose. Objective To compare the reliability of the POSAS scale with the 4‐point scale for facial linear surgical scars and to assess the influence of different scar characteristics on the overall impression. Methods Patients visiting the outpatient clinics of the Maastricht University Medical Centre with linear facial scars were included. The 4‐point scale and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale ( OSAS ) were completed by three independent observers. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale ( PSAS ) was completed by the patient on the day of the visit and 2 weeks later. The intra‐class correlation coefficient ( ICC ) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals ( CI ) were calculated to assess the reliability of the scales. Linear multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate how the score on each aspect affected the overall opinion. Results Fifty scars in 50 patients were included. The ICC of the 4‐point scale was 0.819 (95% CI : 0.708–0.892) for multiple observers and 0.602 (95% CI : 0.447–0.734) for single observer. These were superior to the ICC s of total OSAS scores (0.783 95% CI : 0.547–0.888 for multiple observers and 0.546 95% CI : 0.287–0.726 for single observer). ICC s of individual sub‐items on the OSAS scored even lower. The sub‐items contributed differently to the overall opinion among the different observers or patient. Conclusion In terms of reliability, the overall opinion and the 4‐point scale were superior to the total POSAS score or the sub‐items. Observers do not weight individual scar characteristics equally to arrive at an overall opinion, which challenges the assumption that calculating a total POSAS score by summing of the scores on the individual items is a valid approach.
机译:摘要背景旨在评估和改善经历皮肤病学手术的患者的审美结果,必须使用可靠的评估工具。为此目的开发了4分尺度和患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)。目的比较POSAS规模与面部线性手术疤痕的4分尺度的可靠性,并评估不同瘢痕特征对整体印象的影响。方法介绍了参观Maastricht大学医疗中心的门诊诊所的患者用线性面部疤痕。 4分尺度和观察者SCAR评估规模(OSAS)由三名独立观察员完成。患者瘢痕评估规模(PSAS)由患者在访问当天和2周后完成。计算具有相应95%置信区间(CI)的类内相关系数(ICC)以评估尺度的可靠性。进行线性多变量回归分析以评估每个方面的得分如何影响整体意见。结果50名患者中的50款疤痕。对于单个观察者,4分尺度的ICC为0.819(95%CI:0.708-0.892),为0.602(95%CI:0.447-0.734)。这些优于OSAS分数的ICC S(用于多个观察者的0.783 95%CI:0.547-0.888,为单人观察器0.546 95%CI:0.287-0.726)。 OSA上的单个子项的ICC S甚至更低。子项对不同观察者或患者的整体意见进行了不同。结论在可靠性方面,总体意见和4分量表优于POSAS分数或子项。观察者不同样地批量单独的疤痕特征来达到整体意见,这挑战了通过对各个项目的分数的总结计算总POSAS得分的假设是一种有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号