...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Split‐face study comparing conventional MAL MAL photodynamic therapy in multiple actinic keratosis with complete time vs. half‐time red light LED LED conventional illumination
【24h】

Split‐face study comparing conventional MAL MAL photodynamic therapy in multiple actinic keratosis with complete time vs. half‐time red light LED LED conventional illumination

机译:分裂研究比较常规的MAL MAR光学动力学治疗在多种光学角膜症中的完整时间与半时间红光LED常规照明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Background Conventional photodynamic therapy ( PDT ) with methylaminolevulinic acid ( MAL ) and daylight PDT have demonstrated similar efficacy in the treatment of actinic keratosis ( AK ). The reason for the use of daylight is to reduce pain during illumination but daylight has the limitation of the weather conditions. The difference in the doses of red light applied between these two methods suggests that an intermediate dose with red light conventional illumination could be effective in PDT of AK . Objective To compare the efficiency of conventional MAL ‐ PDT with half‐time conventional red light illumination in patients with multiple AK . Material and methods Adult patients with more than five symmetrically distributed AK were selected. After randomization, one area was treated with conventional PDT (Aktilite ? , 630?nm, 37?J/cm 2 , 8?min), while the contralateral was illuminated half time (Aktilite ? , 630?nm, 37?J/cm 2 , 4?min). Patients evaluated pain in each different side. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6?months after PDT treatment by a blinded dermatologist. A questionnaire to be done at home 24?h after completing treatment was deliver to the patients to evaluate any side‐effects. Results A total of 774 lesions were treated, 385 with conventional PDT and 389 with half‐time PDT ( P ??0.05). Conventional PDT was 85% of complete response of AK (327/385) at 3?months, and half‐time PDT was 82% (319/389). At 6?months, conventional PDT was 70% (268/385) of complete response and half‐time PDT was 65% (252/389). Pain during illumination was significantly lower in the VAS with the half‐time protocol with a mean of 5.59 ( SD 1.48) vs. 6.41 ( SD 1.66) in conventional PDT . No difference in adverse effects was found between protocols. Conclusion Conventional PDT with half‐time illumination in multiple actinic keratosis is as effective as complete time illumination and decreased pain significantly.
机译:摘要背景常规光动力疗法(PDT)与甲基氨基乙酰乙酰乙酸(MAL)和日光PDT在治疗活性角化症(AK)中表现出类似的疗效。使用日光的原因是在照明期间减少疼痛,但日光具有局限性的天气条件。在这两种方法之间施加的红光剂量的差异表明,具有红光传统照明的中间剂量可以在AK的PDT中有效。目的比较多AK患者半常规红光照明的常规MAL - PDT的效率。选择了患有五个以上对称分布式AK的成年患者的成年患者。随机化后,用常规PDT(Aktilite?,630〜Nm,37Ω·j / cm2,8≤m)处理一个区域,而对侧被照亮半时间(aktilite?,630?nm,37?j / cm 2,4?分钟)。患者评估了每个不同的一侧的疼痛。患者在基线,3和6月评估了PDT治疗后盲的皮肤科医生。在Home完成调查问卷24?H完成治疗后,递送给患者评估任何副作用。结果将总共774个病变治疗,385例,具有常规PDT和389,具有半时间PDT(P→& 0.05)。常规PDT为AK(327/385)的完全反应的85%,在3个月,半时间PDT为82%(319/389)。在6个月,常规PDT为70%(268/385)的完全反应,半级PDT为65%(252/389)。在常规PDT中,在VAS中,在VAS中疼痛的疼痛显着降低了常规PDT中的5.59(SD 1.48)与6.41(SD 1.66)的平均值。在协议之间发现了不利影响的差异。结论常规PDT在多种光碱角化症中的半次照射与完全时间照明和疼痛显着下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号