首页> 外文期刊>Journal of seismology >A newly discovered historical earthquake or merely a chronological mistake? Report of Mary Eliza Rogers from October 10, 1856
【24h】

A newly discovered historical earthquake or merely a chronological mistake? Report of Mary Eliza Rogers from October 10, 1856

机译:一个新发现的历史地震或仅仅是一项时间的错误? 玛丽伊丽莎罗杰斯从1856年10月10日的报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In her nineteenth century book "Domestic Life in Palestine", Mary Eliza Rogers describes the earthquake she had experienced in Haifa in the middle of the night between the 10th and 11th of October 1856. Although she reports that the earthquake was well felt in northern Palestine and even slightly damaged structures in Haifa, she is the only one who reported the event. However, on the following night, a destructive earthquake that occurred close to Crete was reported by many contemporary sources. Rogers' report is not cited in any of the existing earthquake catalogs or literature. Thus, the question arises is whether what she reports is an earthquake that was unknown to us till now or perhaps she merely dated incorrectly the event she had experienced. To resolve this question, I interpreted her description of the moon phase at the time of the earthquake occurrence and concluded that Rogers incorrectly dated the event whereas in fact what she had experienced was the Crete earthquake. The rest of her description is probably reliable and reinforces reports of damaged localities along the coast of northern Palestine and southern Lebanon.
机译:在她十九世纪的“巴勒斯坦国内生活”中,玛丽·伊丽莎罗杰斯在1856年10月的10日和11日之间描述了她在海法中遇到的地震。虽然她报道了地震在巴勒斯坦北部感受到了很好的感觉甚至在海法中甚至略微受损的结构,她是唯一一个报告该活动的结构。然而,在第二天的夜晚,许多当代来源报告了靠近克里特岛发生的破坏性地震。任何现有地震目录或文学都没有引用罗杰斯的报告。因此,出现了问题是她报告的是何种问题,直到现在,或许她只是在她经历过的事件时不正确地日期。为了解决这个问题,我在地震发生时解释了她对月球阶段的描述,并得出结论,罗杰斯错误地对此活动进行了错误,而她经历过的是克里特地震。其余的描述可能是可靠的,并加强了巴勒斯坦北部海岸和黎巴嫩南部的损坏地区的报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号