首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites
【24h】

Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites

机译:低收缩复合材料的II类修复体微渗漏和与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with experimental low-shrinking resin composites proposed for bulk filling and to measure their microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin and compare to those of previously marketed low-shrinkage composites. Methods: Class II cavities (7 mm occluso-gingival height, 2 mm mesio-distal depth of the box, 4 mm occlusal depth, 4 mm bucco-lingual width) were prepared in 50 molars and randomly divided into five groups (n=10), according to the material: SureFil SDR flow (SDR), Filtek Silorane (FS) and experimental materials (G-aenial Flo bulk fill, GF; G-aenial Universal Flo bulk fill, GUF; GC Kalore bulk fill, GK). Microleakage was separately assessed at enamel and dentin margins by scoring the depth of silver-nitrate penetration. Twenty teeth divided into five groups (n= 4) were selected for μTBS testing. The same materials as for microleakage assessment were placed in bulk to mid-coronal dentin. Microtensile beams were loaded in tension, and μTBS at failure was calculated in MPa. Microleakage and μTBS data were analyzed by ANOVA on ranks, followed Dunn's post hoc test (P< 0.05). Results: Microleakage was not observed at the enamel interface in any of the groups. At the dentin interface, SDR recorded significantly higher microleakage than the other materials. μTBS of GF, GUF and GK did not differ among each other (33±12 MPa, 31±11 MPa, 30±9 MPa, respectively), while SDR (63±17 MPa) and FS (55±17MPa) achieved significantly higher μTBS values. No direct association between the sealing properties and the bond strength values was observed.
机译:目的:评估用拟用于本体填充的实验性低收缩率树脂复合材料修复的II类腔体的微渗漏,并测量其与牙本质的微拉伸粘合强度(μTBS),并与以前销售的低收缩复合材料进行比较。方法:在50颗磨牙中制备II类腔(咬合齿龈高度为7毫米,盒子的近中距深度为2毫米,咬合深度为4毫米,颊舌宽度为4毫米),并随机分为五组(n = 10) ),根据材料:SureFil SDR流量(SDR),Filtek Silorane(FS)和实验材料(G-aenial Flo填充物,GF; G-aenial Universal Flo填充物,GUF; GC Kalore填充物,GK)。通过对硝酸银渗透的深度进行评分,分别评估了牙釉质和牙本质边缘的微渗漏。选择了分为5组(n = 4)的20颗牙齿进行μTBS测试。将与微渗漏评估相同的材料散装至冠状中段牙本质中。将微张力梁施加张力,破坏时的μTBS以MPa计算。通过ANOVA对微渗漏和μTBS数据进行等级分析,随后进行邓恩事后检验(P <0.05)。结果:任何一组在釉质界面均未观察到微渗漏。在牙本质界面,SDR的微渗漏率明显高于其他材料。 GF,GUF和GK的μTBS彼此之间没有差异(分别为33±12 MPa,31±11 MPa,30±9 MPa),而SDR(63±17 MPa)和FS(55±17MPa)则明显更高μTBS值。没有观察到密封性能和粘合强度值之间的直接关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号