首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Digital plaque imaging evaluation of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice compared with a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice
【24h】

Digital plaque imaging evaluation of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice compared with a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice

机译:与三氯生/共聚物洁齿剂比较的稳定化氟化亚锡洁齿剂的数字斑块成像评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the relative plaque control efficacy of a marketed 0.454% stabilized stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrice relative to a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice using digital plaque imaging analysis (DPIA). Methods: This was a randomized, two-treatment, double-blind, parallel group design study that compared SnF2 and triclosan/copolymer dentifrices over a period of 3 weeks. DPIA was used to capture a digital image of the maxillary and mandibular anterior facial surfaces of 12 teeth and to calculate plaque area coverage. Overnight DPIA images were taken at a baseline visit after which subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups and were required to brush with their assigned dentifrice according to each manufacturer's instructions. Subjects had DPIA assessments on two separate days at the end of Week 3. Results: 96 subjects were randomized to treatment. Plaque area data for 47 subjects per treatment group were compared at Week 3 using ANCOVA. The SnF2 group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in overnight plaque at Week 3 compared to baseline (P= 0.002). The reduction for the triclosan group at Week 3 compared to baseline was not statistically significant (P= 0.24). At Week 3, the SnF2 group demonstrated a 17% lower adjusted mean for overnight plaque relative to the triclosan group with a mean difference that was statistically significant (P 0.05). The Week 3 adjusted mean change from baseline in overnight plaque for the SnF2 group was 3 times greater versus that of the triclosan group (P 0.05). (Am J Dent 2013;26:303-306).
机译:目的:使用数字斑块成像分析(DPIA),比较市售的0.454%稳定的氟化亚锡(SnF2)洁牙剂相对于三氯生/共聚物洁齿剂的相对噬斑控制功效。方法:这是一项随机,两次治疗,双盲,平行组设计研究,在3周的时间内比较了SnF2和三氯生/共聚物洁齿剂。 DPIA用于捕获12颗牙齿的上颌和下颌前面部的数字图像,并计算斑块面积覆盖率。在基线访视时拍摄过夜的DPIA图像,然后将受试者随机分配至两个治疗组之一,并要求根据每个制造商的说明用分配的洁齿剂刷牙。在第3周末的两天中,对受试者进行DPIA评估。结果:96名受试者被随机分配接受治疗。使用ANCOVA在第3周比较每个治疗组47名受试者的斑块面积数据。与基线相比,SnF2组在第3周的过夜斑块有统计学意义的减少(P = 0.002)。与基线相比,第3周三氯生组的减少量无统计学意义(P = 0.24)。在第3周,SnF2组的过夜斑块调整均值相对于三氯生组降低了17%,均值差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。与三氯生组相比,SnF2组的第3周调整后的过夜斑块相对于基线的平均变化是三氯生组的3倍(P <0.05)。 (Am J Dent 2013; 26:303-306)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号