首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >SELF-RATED ACCURACY OF RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION-BASED LOAD PRESCRIPTION IN POWERLIFTERS
【24h】

SELF-RATED ACCURACY OF RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION-BASED LOAD PRESCRIPTION IN POWERLIFTERS

机译:高速公路中的基于劳动力的载荷处方的自评准确度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed male (n = 9) and female (n = 3) powerlifters' (18-49 years) ability to select loads using the repetitions in reserve-based rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for a single set for squat, bench press, and deadlift. Subjects trained 3x per week. For 3 weeks on nonconsecutive days in the weekly order of hypertrophy (8 repetitions at 8 RPE), power (2 repetitions at 8 RPE), and strength (3 repetitions at 9 RPE), using subject-selected loads intended to match the target RPE. Bench press and squat were performed every session and deadlift during strength and power only. Mean absolute RPE differences (vertical bar reported RPE-target RPE vertical bar) ranged from 0.22-0.44, with a mean of 0.33 +/- 0.28 RPE. There were no significant RPE differences within lifts between sessions for squat or deadlift. However, bench press was closer to the target RPE for strength (0.15 +/- 0.42 RPE) vs. power (-0.21 +/- 0.35 RPE, p = 0.05). There were no significant differences within session between lifts for power and strength. However, bench press was closer (0.14 +/- 0.44 RPE) to the target RPE than squat (-0.19 +/- 0.21 RPE) during hypertrophy (p = 0.02). Squat power was closer to the target RPE in week 3 (0.08 +/- 0.29 RPE) vs. 1 (-0.46 +/- 0.69 RPE, p = 0.03). It seems that powerlifters can accurately select loads to reach a prescribed RPE. However, accuracy for 8-repetition sets at 8 RPE may be better for bench press compared with squat. Rating squat power-type training may take 3 weeks to reach peak accuracy. Finally, bench press RPE accuracy seems better closer rather than further from failure (i.e., 3-repetition 9 RPE sets vs. 2-repetition 8 RPE sets).
机译:本研究评估了雄性(n = 9)和雌性(n = 3)Powerlife'(18-49岁),可以使用重复在基于储备的施加(RPE)规模的储备额定值中的重复来选择负载,用于蹲下的单个集合,卧床,和硬拉。受试者每周3次训练。在每周顺序的肥大(8个RPE的8重复)上的非连续日,使用旨在匹配目标RPE的旨在匹配目标RPE的旨在匹配目标RPE的旨在匹配目标RPE的旨在匹配目标RPE的旨在匹配靶RPE的旨在匹配目标RPE的旨在匹配目标RPE的电源(8个RPE)的功率(2个重复),以及9个RPE的3个重复) 。在力量和功率下,每次会话和硬辐射进行台式压力机和下蹲。平均无菌RPE差异(垂直条报告的RPE-靶RPE垂直条)范围为0.22-0.44,平均为0.33 +/- 0.28 rpe。蹲下或硬拉会话之间没有显着的RPE差异。然而,台式压力机更接近强度的目标RPE(0.15 +/- 0.42 rpe)与Power(-0.21 +/- 0.35 RPE,P = 0.05)。电力和力量之间的升降机之间没有显着差异。然而,位于肥大(P = 0.02)的靶RPE上的卧式压榨机更接近靶RPE(0.19 +/- 0.21 rpe)。在第3周(0.08 +/- 0.29 RPE)与1(-0.46 +/- 0.69 RPE,P = 0.03),蹲下功率更接近靶RPE。似乎PowerLifters可以准确地选择加载以达到规定的RPE。然而,与蹲下相比,8 RPE的8次RPE的8重复设定的精度可能更好。评级蹲便器类型培训可能需要3周才能达到峰值精度。最后,替补压力RPE精度似乎更接近而不是进一步从失败(即,3重复9个RPE设置与2重复8 RPE集)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号