首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF SCORING AND PERFORMING PUSH-UPS
【24h】

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF SCORING AND PERFORMING PUSH-UPS

机译:构建两种不同的评分方法和执行俯卧撑的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the construct validity of the standard pushups (STPUs) and hand-release push-ups (HRPUs) by comparing them to the criterion measures of absolute strength (i.e., 1 repetition maximum [RM] bench press [BP]) and relative strength (1RM.body mass(-1)). Thirty-one, college-age males were recruited for the study. The HRPU was performed by lifting the palms from the floor between each push-up (PU), whereas the STPU only required chest contact at the bottom before returning to the support position. Push-up rate was controlled by metronome. A counter-balanced, cross-over design was used with 1 week between each test. Correlations were conducted on push-up scores and criterion measures. In addition, STPU and HRPU scores were compared to determine whether there was a difference in the maximum number of push-ups executed. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether 1RM BP (i.e., absolute strength) might be predicted from push-up performance: 1RM Bench Press kg = 48.675 + (0.8832.body mass) + (1.318.# of standard pushups executed) + (-157.82.PU distance m). Results indicated significantly more HRPUs than STPUs were executed. Push-up raw scores were found to be unrelated to absolute strength. Standard push-up raw scores were found to be significantly correlated with relative strength (r = 0.71, prob. = 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis also indicated that absolute strength may be reasonably estimated if the predictor variables of body mass and vertical push-up distance are considered along with push-up score (R = 0.791, R-2 = 0.62.5%).
机译:本研究的目的是通过将它们与绝对强度的标准测量相比,确定标准俯卧撑(STPU)和手持式俯卧撑(HRPU)的构建有效性(即,1重复最大[RM]替换机[ BP])和相对强度(1RM.BODY MACH(-1))。招募了三十一,招募了这项研究。通过从每个俯卧撑(PU)之间的地板上抬起手掌进行HRPU,而STPU在返回支撑位置之前只需要在底部的胸部接触。俯卧撑率由节拍器控制。反平衡的交叉设计在每个测试之间使用1周使用。对俯卧评分和标准措施进行了相关性。此外,比较STPU和HRPU分数,以确定是否在执行的最大俯卧撑数中是否存在差异。多元回归分析用于确定是否可以从推挽性能预测1RM BP(即绝对强度):1RM替补圈按kg = 48.675 +(0.8832.body质量)+(1.318。执行标准俯卧撑数)+( -157.82.pu距离m)。结果表明比STPU更高的HRPU。发现俯卧撑原始评分与绝对强度无关。发现标准的俯卧撑原始评分与相对强度有显着相关(r = 0.71,prob. = 0.0001)。多元回归分析还表明,如果主体质量和垂直俯卧撑距离的预测变量随着推挽得分(r = 0.791,R-2 = 0.62.5%),则可以合理地估计绝对强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号