...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Bioethics and Politics: Rules of Engagement
【24h】

Bioethics and Politics: Rules of Engagement

机译:生物伦理学和政治学:交往规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the target article, Mark Brown (2009) focuses on commoninterest democratic values and their role in understanding contemporary bioethics. Brown’s analysis is a welcome alternative to the more familiar partisan politicization discourse (focused on left versus right, liberal versus conservative). Indeed, his analysis serves to clarify the main concerns of participants in this often confused and abrasive debate: for those on the right, so-called liberalism focuses on putatively neutral procedures that in fact address substantive questions, but surreptitiously; for those on the left, so-called communitarianism overreaches in defending substantive worldviews that rob citizens of voice and choice. In this commentary,we critique this division of ‘liberal’ versus ‘conservative’ bioethics. In its place, we build on Brown’s analysis to articulate some specific rules necessary for public bioethics bodies to serve as institutions for contesting power in useful and appropriate ways.
机译:在目标文章中,马克·布朗(Mark Brown)(2009)着重讨论了共同利益的民主价值观及其在理解当代生物伦理学中的作用。布朗的分​​析是更受欢迎的党派政治化言论(侧重于左派与右派,自由派与保守派)的受欢迎的替代方案。的确,他的分析有助于弄清这场经常引起混乱和激烈辩论的参与者的主要关切:对于那些在右边的人,所谓的自由主义侧重于假定的中立程序,这些程序实际上解决了实质性问题,但却是秘密的。对于左翼人士来说,所谓的共产主义主义在捍卫抢夺公民发言权和选择权的实质性世界观方面过于努力。在这篇评论中,我们批评了“自由”与“保守”生物伦理学的这种区分。取而代之的是,我们以布朗的分析为基础,阐明了一些必要的特定规则,以使公共生物伦理团体能够以有用和适当的方式竞争权力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号