首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >Pre-, intra-, and/or postoperative arterial and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for breast surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Pre-, intra-, and/or postoperative arterial and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for breast surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:乳腺手术的前,和/或术后动脉和静脉血栓栓塞的预防:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Both thromboembolism and excessive bleeding following breast surgery could result in multiple surgical procedures, breast reconstruction failure, or even mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 5617 female breast surgery patients compared pharmacological prophylaxis to nonpharmacological prophylaxis interventions during the pre-, intra-, and/or postoperative time points and evaluated associated outcomes and complications. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were systematically and independently searched. Patient and clinical characteristics, surgical and medical interventions, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Eleven of the 344 studies queried were eligible for systematic review and meta-analysis, with results from 26 of the possible 117 outcomes and complications using strict PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. Patients receiving intraoperative pharmacological prophylaxis for breast surgery were found to have more reoperations and more occurrences of any bleeding, while patients receiving postoperative pharmacological prophylaxis were found to have more occurrences of any bleeding than patients receiving nonpharmacological prophylaxis. Patients were more likely to receive preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis if they had diabetes mellitus and postoperative chemoprophylaxis if they had higher BMIs. Patients administered pharmacological prophylaxis during the pre-, intra-, and/or postoperative time periods did not show a significant decrease in deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism or increase in hematomas compared to those administered nonpharmacological prophylaxis. (C) 2019 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:乳腺手术后血栓栓塞和过度出血可能导致多种外科手术,乳房重建失败,甚至死亡率。这种系统评价和荟萃分析5617雌性乳腺手术患者将药理学预防与术前,和/或术后时间点进行比较非药物预防干预,并评估相关的结果和并发症。系统和独立搜查了PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,科学网站和Google学者数据库。记录了患者和临床特征,手术和医疗干预,结果和并发症。 344项研究中的11项查询有资格获得系统审查和荟萃分析,结果来自26种可能的117个结果和使用严格的Prisma和Cochrane指南的并发症。发现接受术中药理学预防的乳腺手术的患者有更多的重新进展和更多出血,而接受术后药理预防的患者发现比接受非药物预防的患者更多的出血。如果它们具有较高的BMI,患者更容易获得术前药理学预防和术后化学介质。患者在预先,内和/或术后期间施用药理学预防并未显示出与施用的非药物预防相比的深静脉血栓形成和/或肺栓塞的显着降低。 (c)2019年英国塑料,重建和审美外科医生。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号