首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Economic well-being of rural farm households in Ghana: A?perspective of inequality and polarisation
【24h】

Economic well-being of rural farm households in Ghana: A?perspective of inequality and polarisation

机译:加纳农村农户经济福祉:a?不平等和极化的角度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper investigates economic well-being of rural farm households in Ghana from the perspective of inequality and polarisation, using data from the Ghana Living Standard Survey rounds 5 and 6, and within the framework of disparities in ecological locations, farm size holdings and the main occupation of household heads. It also examines sources of income polarisation and inequality and their implications for poverty distribution among the rural farmers. The results show that distribution of the major crops cultivated generally vary across the farmer categories. Also, biases exist in income distribution among the farmers. The main source of inequality and polarisation is the differences within the individual categories of farmers, however, with respect to the ecological locations, between-group differences is the main source of polarisation. We find that greater proportion of the poorer farmers are found in the savannah zones, as well as among the smallholders and where household heads are engaged in self-employed agricultural activities. Contrarily, large-scale producers, farmers in forest areas, and where farm household heads are in public and private sector jobs are richer. Generally, poverty is concentrated within the farmer categories that incur higher polarisation and inequality indices and have also contributed the greatest to the total inequality and polarisation, whereas the categories that incur the lowest of the indices and have contributed the least to the total indices are wealthier. These findings suggest inequality and polarisation should be mitigated in tandem, and targeting the categories harbouring larger proportions of poorer farmers can reduce poverty more effectively.Highlights?The composition of farmers cultivating the major crops generally vary across the farmer categories in Ghana.?Distribution of economic well-being across the categories of farm households are different and inconsistent.?Inequality and polarisation exist in income distribution among the different sects of rural farm households.?Poverty is more concentrated within the farmer categories with a higher inequality and polarisation, and the vice versa.?A coordinated approach of mitigating income inequality and polarisation is important for reducing poverty among the rural farmers.
机译:本文从不平等和极化的角度调查了加纳的农村农户经济福祉,利用加纳生活标准调查第5和6轮,以及生态地点,农场规模控股和主要的差异框架内占领家庭头。它还探讨了收入极化和不平等的来源,以及农民贫困分布的影响。结果表明,栽培的主要作物的分布通常因农民类别而异。此外,农民之间的收入分配存在偏见。不等式和极化的主要来源是农民个人类别内的差异,然而,关于生态地位,组间差异是极化的主要来源。我们发现,在大草原区以及小农和家庭人头从事自雇农业活动中,发现了更大比例的较贫穷的农民。相反,大规模的生产者,森林地区的农民,农户家庭头在公共和私营部门的工作中有更富裕。一般来说,贫困集中在农民类别内,这种农民类别产生了更高的极化和不平等指数,并且还为总不等式和极化贡献了最大的贡献,而导致索引最低的类别并为总指数贡献最少,则富裕。这些调查结果建议在串联中减轻不平等和极化,针对覆盖较大的较贫困农民的类别可以更有效地减少贫困。高灯?培养主要作物的农民的组成在加纳的农民类别上变化。农场家庭的经济福祉是不同的,不一致的。在农村农户的不同教派中,在农村农户的不同教派中存在出现和极化。在农民类别中的不平等和极化方面更为集中,而且反之亦然,减轻收入不平等和极化的协调方法对于减少农民中的贫困是重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号