首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Class I restoration margin quality in direct resin composites: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
【24h】

Class I restoration margin quality in direct resin composites: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

机译:直接树脂复合材料的I级修复边缘质量:双盲随机对照临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the margin quality of direct resin composite restorations comparing the enameldentin adhesive standard procedure with additional use of adhesive layer at the external outline. Methods: A total of 648 teeth with Class I occlusal lesions in molars and premolars were randomly selected and distributed into two groups of 324 each in order to compare the margin quality with two restoration strategies. Lesions were sealed with the standard adhesion procedure for direct resin composite restorations (Group 1) and with an additional procedure of enamel adhesive on the outer boundary of the finished restoration (Group 2). Evaluation of marginal quality at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was performed and described as good marginal adaption or as poor quality defined as Inadequacy A (IA): overhanging resin or change of color; Inadequacy B (TB): the presence of a gap at the enamel-composite interface that retained the probe tip; or Inadequacy C (IC) presence of gap at the enamel-composite interface with explorer tip penetration of more than 1 mm. Results: Data showed a higher number of Inadequacy A for restorations with the additional technique for marginal 'seal (Group 2): 16 of 24 total (57%) at 6 months; 28 of 37 total (76%) at 12 months; 36 of 44 total (82%) at 18 months; 22 of 33 total (67%) at 24 months; 14 of 21 total (70%) at 36 months and 16 of 25 total (64%) at 48 months. The Inadequacy B and C of marginal seal were more prevalent for restorations without the additional marginal seal (Group 1): 18 of 28 total (64%) at 12 months with inadequacy B; 19 of 25 total (76%) with inadequacy B and 16 total (100%) with inadequacy C at 18 months; 9 of 17 total (53%) with Inadequacy B and 13 total (100%) with Inadequacy C at 24 months; 12 of 17 total (70%) with Inadequacy B and 9 of 13 total (73%) with Inadequacy C at 36 months; 14 of 24 total (58%) with Inadequacy B and 7 of 11 total (63%) with Inadequacy C at 48 months.
机译:目的:为了评估直接树脂复合修复体的边缘质量,将牙釉质粘合剂标准程序与在外部轮廓处额外使用粘合剂层进行比较。方法:共选择648颗磨牙和前磨牙的I类咬合病变的牙齿,分成324组,每组324组,以比较两种修复策略的切缘质量。使用标准的直接树脂复合修复物的粘合程序(第1组)和在完成的修复物的外边界上使用搪瓷胶的附加程序(第2组)密封病变。在6、12、24、36和48个月时对边缘质量进行了评估,并被描述为边缘适应性良好或质量不佳(定义为不足A(IA)):树脂悬垂或颜色变化; B(TB)不足:牙釉质-复合材料界面存在间隙,该间隙保留了探针尖端;或在牙釉质-复合材料界面存在间隙不足C(IC),且探管尖端穿透力超过1 mm。结果:数据显示,采用边缘密封的额外技术(第2组)的修复体A不足的数量更高:6个月时共有24例中有16例(57%);截至12个月,共有37笔中的28笔(76%); 18个月时占44个中的36个(82%); 24个月内共有33个中的22个(67%); 36个月时总共21例中有14例(70%),48个月时总共25个中有16例(64%)。在没有额外的边缘密封的情况下,边缘密封的不足B和C更为普遍(第1组):B不足12个月,共28例中有18例(64%);在18个月时,B总数不足25者中有19例(76%),C不足者16例(100%);在24个月时,B不足的17人中有9人(53%),C不足的13人中有9人(100%);在36个月时,总共17例中有12例(70%)患有B不足,在13例中有9例(73%)患有C不足;在48个月时,B不足者占24人中的14人,占58%; C不足者,占11人中的7人(占63%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号