...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Rethinking Roe v. Wade: Defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition
【24h】

Rethinking Roe v. Wade: Defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition

机译:重新思考Roe诉Wade:面对当代反对派捍卫堕胎权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 2008, many states sought to pass Human Life Amendments, which would extend the definition of personhood to encompass newly fertilized eggs. If such an amendment were to pass, Roe v. Wade, as currently defended by the Supreme Court, may be repealed. Consequently, it is necessary to defend the right to an abortion in a manner that succeeds even if a Human Life Amendment successfully passes. J.J. Thomson's argument in "A Defense of Abortion" successfully achieves this. Her argument is especially strong when one considers that her central thesis-that one person's right to life does not entail the right to use another's person's body for continued sustenance-is pervasive in legal policies in the U.S.A.
机译:2008年,许多州试图通过《人寿修正案》,将人格的定义扩展到新受精的卵子。如果这样的修正案获得通过,最高法院目前辩护的Roe v。Wade案可能会被废除。因此,即使成功通过了《人命修正案》,也必须以成功的方式捍卫堕胎权。 J.J.汤姆森在《抗辩堕胎》中的论点成功实现了这一点。当有人认为自己的中心论点-一个人的生命权并不意味着拥有继续使用另一个人的身体的权利-在美国的法律政策中很普遍时,她的论点就特别有力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号