...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings >SURFACE CLEANLINESS: BY WHOSE DEFINITION?
【24h】

SURFACE CLEANLINESS: BY WHOSE DEFINITION?

机译:表面清洁度:通过谁的定义?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

One of the most contentious inspection hold-points that a QC inspector can have when working with QA oversight is surface cleanliness after abrasive blast-cleaning.Not only are there different standards(SSPC/NACE joint standards vs.ISO 8501-1,”The Swedish Standard”)with different definitions,but the inspection of cleanliness ultimately hinges on a visual estimation of how much staining is present.This inspection is very subjective,but there is a solution.A February 2015 JPCL article1 compares and contrasts the SSPC/NACE joint standards and ISO 8501-1.Table 2 from that article summarizes the differences,and the author astutely points out that,”It is important to always adhere to the surface preparation standard that is written in the specification.”
机译:QC检查员在使用QA监督时,QC检查员的最具争议检查的持有点之一是磨料爆炸清洁后的表面清洁度。仅没有不同的标准(SSPC / NACE联合标准VS.ISO 8501-1,“ 瑞典标准“)具有不同的定义,但清洁度的检查最终铰接在视觉估计上存在有多少染色。这检查是非常主观的,但有一个解决方案。2015年2月JPCL第1条比较和对比SSPC / NACE 联合标准和ISO 8501-1.Table 2从该文章中总结了差异,作者略微指出,“始终坚持在规范中写入的表面准备标准很重要。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号