...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic research >Validation of gait analysis with dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in patients operated with total hip arthroplasty
【24h】

Validation of gait analysis with dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in patients operated with total hip arthroplasty

机译:总髋关节置换术患者动态辐射静脉分析(RSA)验证步态分析(RSA)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We simultaneously examined 14 patients with OTS and dynamic radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to evaluate the accuracy of both skin- and a cluster-marker models. The mean differences between the OTS and RSA system in hip flexion, abduction, and rotation varied up to 9.5 degrees for the skin-marker and up to 11.3 degrees for the cluster-marker models, respectively. Both models tended to underestimate the amount of flexion and abduction, but a significant systematic difference between the marker and RSA evaluations could only be established for recordings of hip abduction using cluster markers (p=0.04). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.7 or higher during flexion for both models and during abduction using skin markers, but decreased to 0.5-0.6 when abduction motion was studied with cluster markers. During active hip rotation, the two marker models tended to deviate from the RSA recordings in different ways with poor correlations at the end of the motion (ICC 0.4). During active hip motions soft tissue displacements occasionally induced considerable differences when compared to skeletal motions. The best correlation between RSA recordings and the skin- and cluster-marker model was found for studies of hip flexion and abduction with the skin-marker model. Studies of hip abduction with use of cluster markers were associated with a constant underestimation of the motion. Recordings of skeletal motions with use of skin or cluster markers during hip rotation were associated with high mean errors amounting up to about 10 degrees at certain positions. (c) 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1515-1522, 2017.
机译:我们同时检查了14例OTS和动态辐射测量分析(RSA),以评估皮肤和簇标记模型的准确性。髋关节屈曲,绑架和旋转中的OTS和RSA系统之间的平均差异可达9.5度,分别为簇标记模型的高达11.3度。这两种模型都倾向于低估屈曲和绑架量,但只能使用群集标记来建立标记和RSA评估之间的显着系统差异(P = 0.04)。在使用皮肤标记物的弯曲和绑架期间,在弯曲期间,阶级相关系数(ICC)为0.7或更高,但使用群集标记研究了绑架运动时,绑定到0.5-0.6。在主动臀部旋转期间,两个标记模型倾向于以不同方式偏离RSA录制,在运动结束时的相关性差(ICC 0.4)。在活跃的臀部运动期间,与骨骼运动相比,软组织位移偶尔诱导相当大的差异。 RSA录音与皮肤和簇标记模型之间的最佳相关性被发现用于与皮肤标记模型的髋关节屈曲和绑架研究。使用聚类标记的髋关节绑架研究与恒定低估了运动。髋部旋转期间使用皮肤或簇标记的骨骼运动的录像与在某些位置处的高于大约10度的高平均误差相关。 (c)2016骨科研究会。由Wiley Hearyicals,Inc.J Orthop Res 35:1515-1522,2017出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号