首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry >Phenobarbitone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or sodium valproate for newly diagnosed adult epilepsy: a randomised comparative monotherapy trial.
【24h】

Phenobarbitone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or sodium valproate for newly diagnosed adult epilepsy: a randomised comparative monotherapy trial.

机译:苯吡酮,苯妥林,卡巴马嗪,或丙酮酸钠用于新诊断的成人癫痫:随机的比较单治疗试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent studies have shown that most newly diagnosed epileptic patients can be satisfactorily treated with a single antiepileptic drug. We therefore undertook a prospective randomised pragmatic trial of the comparative efficacy and toxicity of four major antiepileptic drugs, utilised as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epileptic patients. Between 1981 and 1987 243 adult patients aged 16 years or over, newly referred to two district general hospitals with a minimum of two previously untreated tonic-clonic or partial with or without secondary generalised seizures were randomly allocated to treatment with phenobarbitone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or sodium valproate. The protocol was designed to conform with standard clinical practice. Efficacy was assessed by time to first seizure after the start of treatment and time to enter one year remission. The overall outcome with all of the four drugs was good with 27% remaining seizure free and 75% entering one year of remission by three years of follow up. No significant differences between the four drugs were found for either measure of efficacy at one, two, or three years of follow up. The overall incidence of unacceptable side effects, necessitating withdrawal of the randomised drug, was 10%. For the individual drugs phenobarbitone (22%) was more likely to be withdrawn than phenytoin (3%), carbamazepine (11%), and sodium valproate (5%). In patients with newly diagnosed tonic-clonic or partial with or without secondary generalised seizures, the choice of drug will be more influenced by considerations of toxicity and costs.
机译:最近的研究表明,大多数新诊断的癫痫患者可以用单一的抗癫痫药物令人满意地治疗。因此,我们对新诊断的癫痫患者的单药治疗,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机务实试验对比较抗癫痫药物的比较疗效和毒性。 1981年至1987年间243年间成年患者16岁或以上,新增两个地区综合医院,至少有两个以前未经治疗的滋补克隆或部分有或没有次要的广泛癫痫发作,被随机分配给用苯吡酮,苯妥辛,卡马祖流治疗治疗或戊酸钠。该方案旨在符合标准临床实践。在治疗开始后首次癫痫发作的时间评估了功效,进入一年缓解。所有四种药物的整体结果都擅长27%的癫痫发作,75%进入一年后三年后的一年。发现四种药物之间没有显着差异,以便在一次,两年或三年的跟进中进行疗效。无可接受的副作用的总体发病率,需要戒断随机药物,为10%。对于个体药物,苯吡啶酮(22%)更可能被撤回,而不是苯妥林(3%),卡巴马嗪(11%)和戊酸钠(5%)。在具有或没有二级广义癫痫发作的新诊断的滋补克隆或部分患者中,通过对毒性和成本的考虑来说,药物的选择将更受影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号