...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of audiology >Comparing pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds in adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz.
【24h】

Comparing pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds in adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz.

机译:比较成人在3000和6000 Hz时的纯音,脉冲音和杂音阈值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: Pulsed and warbled tones are suitable substitutions for pure tones in hearing threshold measurement according to the 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association guidelines. These guidelines also recommend measuring thresholds at 3000 and 6000 Hz. To date, there is no research directly supporting substitution of pulsed or warbled tones for pure tones at 3000 and 6000 Hz for listeners with normal hearing or with hearing loss. This study compared pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds at 3000 and 6000 Hz. METHOD: Forty-seven adults with normal hearing and 16 adults with sensorineural hearing loss participated in this study. Air-conduction thresholds were elicited with pure tones at octave intervals from 250 to 8000 Hz and with pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone stimuli at 3000 and 6000 Hz. RESULTS: Small mean differences in thresholds were obtained using each of the 3 stimulus types for both listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss. Some of the mean differences tested were found to be statistically significant. The differences were nevertheless small and in all cases within the clinically accepted 5-dB step size. CONCLUSION: Although substitutions did not violate the 5-dB step size, the slope of a listener's hearing loss may be a factor in the inaccuracy of measurement during the substitution of warbled tones for pure tones.
机译:用途:根据2005年美国语音-语言-听力协会指南,在听觉阈值测量中,脉冲音和杂音是纯音的合适替代品。这些准则还建议在3000和6000 Hz下测量阈值。迄今为止,尚无直接支持用脉冲或无声音调代替3000和6000 Hz的纯音调来代替听力正常或听力丧失的听众的研究。这项研究比较了3000和6000 Hz时的纯音,脉冲音和杂音阈值。方法:四十七名听力正常的成年人和十六名感觉神经性听力损失的成年人参加了这项研究。空气传导阈值是通过以250至8000 Hz的八度音程间隔的纯音以及以3000和6000 Hz的纯,脉冲和杂音声刺激来引发的。结果:对于听力正常和听力丧失的两种听觉者,使用三种刺激类型中的每一种都获得了阈值的平均差异。发现测试的一些均值差异具有统计学意义。然而,差异很小,并且在所有情况下均在临床可接受的5 dB步长范围内。结论:尽管替换没有违反5 dB的步长,但听者听力损失的斜率可能是用纯音替换纯音期间测量不准确的一个因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号