首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >An Error Theory of Biotechnology and the Ethics of Chemical Breakups: It Is the Reasons, Not the Pharmaceuticals, That Are Important in Defending Against Perilous Love
【24h】

An Error Theory of Biotechnology and the Ethics of Chemical Breakups: It Is the Reasons, Not the Pharmaceuticals, That Are Important in Defending Against Perilous Love

机译:错误的生物技术理论和化学崩溃的伦理学:捍卫抵御危险恋爱的重要原因不是制药,而是原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this commentary, I offer an account of an error theory of biotechnology and apply it to Brian D. Earp, Olga A. Wudarczyk, Anders Sandberg, and Julian Savulescu’s (2013) ethical framework for chemical breakups. Applying this error theory to their framework has two interesting implications. First, it illustrates that rather than the ethics of using pharmaceuticals for chemical breakups, this framework is really about the reasons and conditions for which individuals should act to defend against perilous love. Second, it shows that the manner inwhich this framework approaches the topic of chemical breakups is one way to advance discussions about the ethics of biotechnologies.
机译:在这篇评论中,我介绍了生物技术的错误理论,并将其应用于Brian D. Earp,Olga A. Wudarczyk,Anders Sandberg和Julian Savulescu(2013)的化学分解伦理框架。将此错误理论应用于其框架有两个有趣的含义。首先,它说明了该框架实际上是关于个人应采取行动抵御危险爱情的原因和条件,而不是使用药物进行化学破坏的道德规范。其次,它表明,该框架处理化学分解主题的方式是推进有关生物技术伦理学讨论的一种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号