...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology >Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: Comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models.
【24h】

Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: Comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models.

机译:动态N-13氨宠物成像评估心肌灌注:2种示踪动力学模型的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) by dynamic nitrogen 13 ammonia (NH(3)) positron emission tomography (PET) uses tracer kinetic modeling to analyze time-activity curves. We compared 2 commonly used models with 2 compartments (2C) and 3 compartments (3C) for quantification of MBF and coronary flow reserve (CFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients underwent NH(3) PET at rest and during hyperemia. Time-activity curves for blood pool and myocardial segments were obtained from short-axis images of dynamic sequences. Model fitting of the 2C and 3C models was performed to estimate regional MBF. MBF values calculated by 2C and 3C models were 0.98 +/- 0.31 mL.min(-1).g(-1) and 1.11 +/- 0.37 mL.min(-1).g(-1), respectively, at rest (P < .0001) and 2.79 +/- 1.18 mL.min(-1).g(-1) and 2.46 +/- 1.02 mL.min(-1).g(-1), respectively, during hyperemia (P < .01), resulting in a CFR of 3.02 +/- 1.31 and 2.39 +/- 1.15 (P < .0001), respectively. Significant correlation was observed between the 2models for calculation of resting MBF (r = 0.78), hyperemic MBF (r = 0.68), and CFR (r = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Measurements of MBF and CFR by 2C and 3C models are significantly related. However, quantification of MBF and CFR significantly differs between the methods. This difference needs to be considered when normal values are established or when measurements obtained with different methods need to be compared.
机译:背景:动态氮气13氨(NH(3))正电子发射断层扫描(PET)使用示踪动力学建模来分析时间活性曲线的测量。我们将2个常用型号与2个隔室(2C)和3个隔室(3C)进行比较,用于定量MBF和冠状动物流量储备(CFR)。方法和结果:七十七名患者在休息和充血期间接受NH(3)宠物。从动态序列的短轴图像获得血液池和心肌段的时间活性曲线。进行2C和3C模型的模型配件以估算区域MBF。由2C和3C模型计算的MBF值分别为0.98 +/- 0.31 ml.min(-1).g(-1)和1.11 +/- 0.37 ml.min(-1).g(-1),在休息(p <.0001)和2.79 +/- 1.18 ml.min(-1).g(-1)和2.46 +/- 1.02 ml.min(-1).g(-1).g(-1).g(-1),在充血期间(P <.01),导致CFR分别为3.02 +/- 1.31和2.39 +/- 1.15(p <.0001)。 2Models之间观察到显着的相关性,用于计算静息MBF(r = 0.78),血液MBF(r = 0.68)和CFR(r = 0.68)。结论:2C和3C模型的MBF和CFR测量有显着相关。然而,MBF和CFR的定量显着不同于这些方法之间。当建立正常值或者需要比较不同方法获得的测量时,需要考虑这种差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号