首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgical sciences >Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?
【24h】

Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?

机译:选民在激进的方进入议会时是否会偏离?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do voters polarize ideologically when radical views gain political legitimacy, or does the rise of radical voices merely reflect societal conflict? We argue that elite polarization as signaled by radical parties' first entrance into parliament leads to voter divergence. Immediately after the election, legitimization and backlash effects mean that voters on both ideological sides move toward the extremes. In the longer term, this polarization is solidified because of radical parties' parliamentary presence. A panel study of Dutch voters shows that the 2002 parliamentary entrance of a radical-right party indeed led to immediate ideological polarization across the political spectrum. Estimating time-series cross-sectional models on Eurobarometer data from 17 countries (1973-2016) shows an additional long-term impact of radical-right party entry on polarization. The presence of radical voices on the right has polarizing effects, illustrating how such institutional recognition and legitimization can have a far-reaching impact on society.
机译:选民是否在激进的观点获得政治合法性时偏离意识形态,或者自由基声音的兴起仅仅反映社会冲突?我们认为,被激进的派对首先进入议会的精英极化导致选民发散。选举后立即,合法化和反弹效应意味着两侧思想两侧的选民走向极端。在长期内,由于基团的议会存在,这种极化是凝固的。荷兰选民的小组研究表明,2002年激进右派的议会入口确实导致了对政治频谱的立即思想极化。从17个国家(1973-2016)估算欧元计数数据上的时间串联横截面模型(1973-2016)显示了激进的右派进入极化的额外长期影响。右侧的激进声音的存在具有偏振效应,说明了这种制度认可和合法化如何对社会产生深远的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号