首页> 外文期刊>Journal of memory and language >Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?
【24h】

Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

机译:句法处理中的个体差异:是否有证据表明读者文本互动?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There remains little consensus about whether there exist meaningful individual differences in syntactic processing and, if so, what explains them. We argue that this partially reflects the fact that few psycholinguistic studies of individual differences include multiple constructs, multiple measures per construct, or tests for reliable measures. Here, we replicated three major syntactic phenomena in the psycholinguistic literature: use of verb distributional statistics, difficulty of object-versus subject-extracted relative clauses, and resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguities. We examine whether any individual differences in these phenomena could be predicted by language experience or general cognitive abilities (phonological ability, verbal working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed). We find correlations between individual differences and offline, but not online, syntactic phenomena. Condition effects on online reading time were not consistent within individuals, limiting their ability to correlate with other measures. We suggest that this might explain controversy over individual differences in language processing.
机译:关于句法处理是否存在有意义的个体差异,仍然存在毫无符合达成的共识,如果是的话,那么解释它们。我们认为,这部分反映了对个体差异的少数心理语言学研究包括多种构造,每个构造的多种测量,或测试可靠措施。在这里,我们在精神语言学文献中复制了三个主要的句法现象:使用动词分配统计数据,对象与受试者提取的相对条款的难度,以及相对条款附件歧义的解决。我们检查这些现象中的任何个体差异是否可以通过语言经验或通用认知能力(语音能力,口头工作记忆容量,抑制控制和感知速度)来预测。我们在各个差异和离线之间找到相关性,但不是在线,句法现象。在线阅读时间的条件效应在个人内并不一致,限制了与其他措施相关的能力。我们建议这可能解释对语言处理的个体差异的争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号