...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Who cares? The lost legacy of Archie Cochrane
【24h】

Who cares? The lost legacy of Archie Cochrane

机译:谁在乎? 遗失的遗产了Archie Cochrane

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the last 20 years, the evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement has sought to develop standardised approaches to patient treatment by drawing on research results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane Collaboration and its eponym, Archie Cochrane, have become symbols of this development, and Cochrane's book Effectiveness and Efficiency from 1972 is often referred to as the first sketch of what was to become EBM. In this article, we claim that this construction of EBM's historical roots is based on a selective reading of Cochrane's text. Through a close reading of this text, we show that the principal aim of modern EBM, namely to warrant clinical decisions based on evidence drawn from RCTs, is not part of Cochrane's original project. He had more modest ambitions for what RCTs can accomplish, and, more importantly, he was more concerned with care and equality than are his followers in the EBM movement. We try to reconstruct some of Cochrane's lost legacy and to articulate some of the important silences in Effectiveness and Efficiency. From these clues it might be possible, we argue, to remodel EBM in a broader, more pluralistic, more democratic and less authoritarian manner.
机译:在过去的20年中,基于证据的医学(EBM)运动试图通过抽取随机对照试验(RCT)的研究结果来制定标准化的患者治疗方法。 Cochrane协作及其EgOmmon,Archie Coxm,已成为这种发展的象征,1972年的Cochrane的书本效率和效率通常被称为ebm的最初草图。在本文中,我们声称,这种EBM的历史根源的建设是基于Cochrane文本的选择性阅读。通过对本文的密切阅读,我们表明现代EBM的主要目标,即根据RCT绘制的证据来保证临床决策,这不是Cochrane原始项目的一部分。他对RCT可以实现的雄心勃勃,更重要的是,更重要的是,他更关心护理和平等,而不是他在EBM运动中的追随者。我们试图重建一些Cochrane失去的遗产,并在有效和效率下表达了一些重要的沉默。从这些线索来看,我们可能会争辩,以更广泛,更加多元化,更卑鲜力和较不专制的方式改造EBM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号