首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Psychology >Response to 'A note on the standardized covariance'
【24h】

Response to 'A note on the standardized covariance'

机译:回应“标准化协方差关于标准协方差”的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a recent paper, Andraszewicz and Rieskamp (2014) proposed the standardized covariance as a measure of association, similarity and co-riskiness. Budescu and Bo (2017) wrote a comment on the proposed measure, in which they interpret the standardized covariance as a measure of additive association, or a "measure of disparity between the ranges of outcomes offered by two lotteries" (Budescu and Bo, 2017). In the reply to this comment, we point out that the statistical interpretation of the standardized covariance provided by Budescu and Bo (2017) is strongly linked with its cognitive interpretation. Also, in this comment, we give a cognitive interpretation to the Budescu and Bo's (2017) analytical findings of the similarity measure for statistically independent gambles proposed by Andraszewicz and Rieskamp (2014). (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在最近的一篇论文中,Andraszewicz和Rieskamp(2014)提出了标准化的协方差,作为协会,相似性和共同风险的衡量标准。 Budescu和Bo(2017)对拟议措施提出了评论,其中他们将标准化的协方差解释为一种添加剂协会的衡量标准,或“两次彩票所提供的结果范围之间的差距”(Budescu和Bo,2017年, )。 在对此评论的答复中,我们指出,Budescu和Bo(2017年)提供的标准协方差的统计解释与其认知解释有关。 此外,在此评论中,我们向Budescu和Bo的认知解释和博(2017)Andraszewicz和Rieskamp(2014)提出的统计独立赌博的相似性措施的分析结果。 (c)2016年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号