...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries >Integrating the API SRA methodology and game theory for improving chemical plant protection
【24h】

Integrating the API SRA methodology and game theory for improving chemical plant protection

机译:集成API SRA方法和博弈论改善化学植物保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Game theory has been employed in academia to study the improvement of security in chemical plants. Being able to model intelligent interactions between adaptive adversaries and defenders is the main advantage of game theory, while the main criticisms of the usage of game theory is that it is mathematically complicated and that it over-simplifies reality. The ANSI/API standard 780 on Security Risk Assessment for the petroleum and petrochemical industries (abbreviated as the "API SRA methodology"), conversely, provides a systematic approach for obtaining qualitative or semi-quantitative data, and is criticized on its failure at modelling strategic (and intelligent) adversaries. Integration of game theory and the API SRA methodology for improving chemical plant protection is therefore an interesting domain of study. In this paper, the API SRA methodology bridges the gap between "chemical security reality" and "chemical security theory (that is, game theoretic models)", by providing quantitative inputs for game theoretic models and by reflecting on game theoretic results with respect to industrial practice.
机译:博弈论已在学术界中受雇,研究化工厂的安全性。能够建模自适应对手和防御者之间的智能相互作用是博弈论的主要优势,而对游戏理论的使用的主要批评是在数学上复杂并且它过度简化现实。关于石油和石化行业的安全风险评估的ANSI / API标准780(缩写为“API SRA方法”),相反,提供了获得定性或半定量数据的系统方法,并批评其在建模时失败战略(和聪明)对手。因此,博弈论和API SRA方法改善化学植物保护的方法是一个有趣的研究领域。在本文中,API SRA方法通过为游戏理论模型提供定量输入,并通过反思游戏理论结果来桥接“化学安全现实”和“化学安全理论(即,游戏理论模型)之间的差距。工业实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号