...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of investigative surgery: The official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research >Comparison of the Conventional Surgery and the Surgery Assisted by 3d Printing Technology in the Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures
【24h】

Comparison of the Conventional Surgery and the Surgery Assisted by 3d Printing Technology in the Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures

机译:常规手术与三维印刷技术辅助手术的比较在治疗皮骨骨折中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: This study was aimed to compare conventional surgery and surgery assisted by 3D printing technology in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. In addition, we also investigated the effect of 3D printing technology on the communication between doctors and patients. Methods: we enrolled 75 patients with calcaneal fracture from April 2014 to August 2016. They were divided randomly into two groups: 35 cases of 3D printing group, 40 cases of conventional group. The individual models were used to simulate the surgical procedures and carry out the surgery according to plan in 3D printing group. Operation duration, blood loss volume during the surgery, number of intraoperative fluoroscopy and fracture union time were recorded. The radiographic outcomes Bohler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal width and calcaneal height and final functional outcomes including VAS and AOFAS score as well as the complications were also evaluated. Besides, we made a simple questionnaire to verify the effectiveness of the 3D-printed model for both doctors and patients. Results: The operation duration, blood loss volume and number of intraoperative fluoroscopy for 3D printing group was 71.4 +/- 6.8 minutes, 226.1 +/- 22.6 ml and 5.6 +/- 1.9 times, and for conventional group was 91.3 +/- 11.2 minutes, 288.7 +/- 34.8 ml and 8.6 +/- 2.7 times respectively. There was statistically significant difference between the conventional group and 3D printing group (p < 0.05). Additionally, 3D printing group achieved significantly better radiographic results than conventional group both postoperatively and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). However, No significant difference was noted in the final functional outcomes between the two groups. As for complications, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore, the questionnaire showed that both doctors and patients exhibited high scores of overall satisfaction with the use of a 3D printing model. Conclusion: This study suggested the clinical feasibility of 3D printing technology in treatment of calcaneal fractures.
机译:目的:本研究旨在将常规手术和手术进行比较3D打印技术在治疗转析骨折中的辅助。此外,我们还调查了3D打印技术对医生与患者的沟通的影响。方法:从2014年4月到2016年8月,我们注册了75例皮肤骨折患者。它们将随机分为两组:35例3D印刷组,常规组40例。各个模型用于模拟外科手术,并根据3D印刷组的计划进行手术。操作持续时间,手术期间的血液损失体积,记录术中透视和骨折时间的数量。还评估了射线照相结果波峰角,吞噬角度,吞噬角度,对角宽度和钙质高度以及最终功能性结果以及并发症,包括VAS和AOFAS得分以及并发症。此外,我们制作了一个简单的问卷,以验证两种医生和患者的3D印刷模型的有效性。结果:3D印刷组的操作持续时间,血液损失体积和术中透明透视次数为71.4 +/- 6.8分钟,226.1 +/-22.6 ml和5.6 +/- 1.9次,以及常规组为91.3 +/- 11.2分钟,288.7 +/- 34.8 ml和8.6 +/- 2.7次。常规组和3D印刷组之间存在统计学上有显着差异(P <0.05)。另外,3D打印组比术后和最终随访术语和最终的后续术(P <0.05)实现了比常规组更好的射线照相结果。但是,两组之间的最终功能结果没有发现显着差异。至于并发症,两组之间没有显着差异。此外,调查问卷表明,使用3D打印模型,医生和患者均表现出总体满意度。结论:本研究表明3D打印技术在治疗皮骨骨折中的临床可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号