首页> 外文期刊>Journal of laparoendoscopic and advanced surgical techniques, Part A >A Comparison of the Relative Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Choledochotomy with Primary Closure and Endoscopic Treatment for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Cholelithiasis
【24h】

A Comparison of the Relative Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Choledochotomy with Primary Closure and Endoscopic Treatment for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Cholelithiasis

机译:腹腔镜胆固度与胆石病胆管石初级闭合和内镜治疗的相对安全性和疗效的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: To date, several clinical trials have demonstated that both one-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with common bile duct exploration (LC+BDE) with primary closure and one-stage LC combined with endoscopic stone extraction (LC+ESE) are the two primary clinical approaches to treat cholelithiasis. However, no studies to date have directly compared the LC+BDE with primary closure and one-stage LC+ESE procedures. We, therefore, conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with cholelithiasis who had been treated through LC+ESE or LC+BDE to compare these two approaches for the treatment of cholecystitis and common bile duct stones (CCBDS).
机译:背景:迄今为止,几种临床试验证明了一阶段腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与常用胆管勘探(LC + BDE)与初级闭合和一级LC联合联合内窥镜石提取(LC + ESE)是合并的 治疗胆石病的两种主要临床方法。 但是,迄今为止没有研究直接将LC + BDE与初级闭合和一级LC + ESE程序进行比较。 因此,我们对通过LC + ESE或LC + BDE治疗的胆石病患者进行了回顾性分析,以比较这两种方法治疗胆囊炎和常见的胆管石(CCBD)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号