首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Evolution >Subsistence strategies during the Late Pleistocene in the southern Cape of South Africa: Comparing the Still Bay of Blombos Cave with the Howiesons Poort of Klipdrift Shelter
【24h】

Subsistence strategies during the Late Pleistocene in the southern Cape of South Africa: Comparing the Still Bay of Blombos Cave with the Howiesons Poort of Klipdrift Shelter

机译:南非南部末期更新世期间的生存战略:将Blombos洞仍然与Howiesons笨拙的克里普莱特庇护所的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Still Bay (SB) and Howiesons Poort (HP) were two significant techno-complexes in the Middle Stone Age and key periods in the expression of behavioral complexity. In this study, we compare the recently excavated fauna from the SB layers at Blombos Cave (BBC) with that from the HP levels at Klipdrift Shelter (KDS) in the southern Cape of South Africa. We consider our findings in the framework of recent models for early human subsistence behavior. In particular, we link our study with models involving resource intensification to examine whether foraging strategies in the HP were more or less intensive than those in the SB. Based on our criteria used to assess intensification-the exploitation of low-ranked prey, the processing of low-utility elements, transport decisions, and occupational intensity intensive subsistence strategies are more evident at KDS than BBC. Our results suggest that low-ranked elements were processed more heavily and diet breath was broader at KDS than at BBC. However, foraging ranges may have been more extensive at BBC than at KDS. Taphonomic data also suggests that the SB at BBC was a low-intensity, sporadically occupied period in contrast to the high-intensity occupations during the HP at KDS. We argue that this may be related to differences in mobility and residential patterns between these techno-complexes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:静止湾(SB)和Howiesons Poort(HP)是中间石年龄的两种重要的技术综合体和表达行为复杂性的关键期。在这项研究中,我们将最近被挖掘的动物群与Blombos Cave(BBC)的SB层进行了比较,其中来自南非南部的Klipdrift庇护所(KDS)的HP水平。我们考虑在最近的早期人类生活行为模型的框架中的调查结果。特别是,我们将我们的研究与涉及资源强化的模型进行研究,以检查惠普中的锻造策略是否比某些人员更少或多或少。基于我们用于评估强化的标准 - 利用低级猎物,低实用元素,运输决策和职业强度密集的生存策略的加工在KDS比BBC更明显。我们的研究结果表明,低级元素在KDS比BBC更广泛地加工了较大的元素,饮食呼吸更广泛。然而,觅食范围可能在BBC比KDS更广泛。术语数据还表明,BBC的SB是低强度,散向占用时段,与KDS的HP期间的高强度占用相反。我们认为这可能与这些技术复合物之间的移动性和住宅模式的差异有关。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号