...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Agricultural Economics >How do agricultural policy restrictions on global trade and welfare differ across commodities?
【24h】

How do agricultural policy restrictions on global trade and welfare differ across commodities?

机译:不同商品对全球贸易和福利的农业政策限制有何不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For decades the world's agricultural markets have been highly distorted by government policies, but differently for different commodities such that a ranking of weighted average nominal rates of assistance across countries can be misleading as an indicator of the trade or welfare effects of policies affecting global markets. This article develops two theory-based indicators, drawing on the recent literature on trade restrictiveness indexes. It estimates those indicators for each of 28 key agricultural commodities from 1960 to 2004, based on a sample of 75 countries that together account for more than three-quarters of the world's production of those agricultural commodities.
机译:几十年来,全球农业市场一直受到政府政策的高度扭曲,但是对于不同商品而言却有所不同,因此,各国对加权平均名义名义援助率的排名可能会产生误导作用,以此作为影响全球市场的政策的贸易或福利影响指标。本文根据贸易限制指数的最新文献,开发了两个基于理论的指标。它根据75个国家的样本估计了1960年至2004年期间28种主要农产品的指标,这些国家合计占世界这些农产品产量的四分之三以上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号