首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health and social behavior >The Two Faces of Diversity: The Relationships between Religious Polarization, Religious Fractionalization, and Self-rated Health
【24h】

The Two Faces of Diversity: The Relationships between Religious Polarization, Religious Fractionalization, and Self-rated Health

机译:多样性的两面:宗教极化,宗教萧条,自我评价的健康之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A dominant discourse in the social sciences theorizes that religious diversity puts individuals' health at risk via interreligious hostility. However, this discourse overlooks the different subtypes of religious diversity and the moderation of political institutions. To better understand the issue of diversity and health, in this study, we distinguish between two subtypes of religious diversity-polarization and fractionalization-and argue that their impacts on health are heterogeneous. Using a sample of 67,399 individuals from 51 societies drawn from the 2010-2014 wave of the World Values Survey, our multilevel analyses show that religious polarization is negatively associated with individual health, whereas the health effects of religious fractionalization are positive. Moreover, the associations between religious polarization/fractionalization and individual health are found to depend on the democratic level of the state. In more democratic countries, the negative effects of polarization on health are mitigated, and the positive effects of fractionalization are stronger.
机译:社会科学的主导话语大观化了宗教多样性通过互感敌意使个人健康受到风险的影响。然而,这个话语忽视了不同的宗教多样性亚型和政治机构的审核。为了更好地了解多样性和健康问题,在这项研究中,我们区分了两种宗教分集 - 极化和厚度化的亚型 - 并争辩说它们对健康的影响是异质的。使用从2010-2014浪潮的51个社会的67,399个人的样本,我们的多级分析表明,宗教极化与个体健康产生了负面影响,而宗教缩小化的健康影响是积极的。此外,发现宗教极化/厚度和个人健康之间的协会取决于国家的民主水平。在更多的民主国家,减轻了极化对健康的负面影响,厚度化的积极影响更强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号