...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental zoology, Part B. Molecular and developmental evolution >Computing the Extended Synthesis: Mapping the Dynamics and Conceptual Structure of the Evolvability Research Front
【24h】

Computing the Extended Synthesis: Mapping the Dynamics and Conceptual Structure of the Evolvability Research Front

机译:计算扩展合成:映射进化性研究前面的动态和概念结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Since the late 1970s, the field of evolutionary biology has undergone empirical and theoretical developments that have threaten the pillars of evolutionary theory. Some evolutionary biologists have recently argued that evolutionary biology is not experiencing a paradigm shift, but an expansion of the modern synthesis. Philosophers of biology focusing on scientific practices seem to agree with this pluralistic interpretation and have argued that evolutionary theory should rather be seen as an organized network of multiple problem agendas with diverse disciplinary contributors. In this paper, I apply a computational analysis to study the dynamics and conceptual structure of one of the main emerging problem agendas in evolutionary biology: evolvability. I have used CiteSpace, an application for visualizing and analyzing trends and patterns in scientific literature that applies cocitation analysis to identify scientific specialities. I analyze the main clusters of the evolvability cocitation network with the aim to identify the main research lines and the interdisciplinary relationships that structure this research front. I then compare these results with the existing classifications of evolvability concepts, and identify four main conceptual tensions within the definitions of evolvability. Finally, I argue that there is a lot of usefulness in the inconsistency in which the term evolvability is used in biological research. I claim that evolvability research has set up trading zones in biology that make possible interdisciplinary exchanges. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:自20世纪70年代末以来,进化生物学领域经历了实证和理论发展,威胁了进化理论的柱子。一些进化的生物学家最近认为进化生物学没有经历范式转变,而是扩大现代合成。重点介绍科学实践的生物学哲学家似乎同意这种多元化的解释,并认为进化理论应该被视为具有不同纪律贡献者的多个问题议程的组织网络。在本文中,我应用了计算分析,以研究进化生物学中主要新兴问题议程之一的动态和概念结构:进化。我已经使用CiteSpace,这是在科学文献中可视化和分析趋势和模式的申请,该文献应用Cocitation分析来识别科学专业。我分析了进化性愈合网络的主要集群,旨在识别构建本研究前面的主要研究线和跨学科关系。然后,我将这些结果与现有的进化性概念进行比较,并确定在进化的定义中的四个主要概念紧张局势。最后,我认为在生物学研究中使用的不一致性具有很多不一致的有用性。我声称进化性研究已经在生物学中设立了交易区,使得可能的跨学科交易所。 (c)2017 Wiley期刊,Inc。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号