首页> 外文期刊>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] >Three‐year clinical performance of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures
【24h】

Three‐year clinical performance of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures

机译:单片和部分嵌体氧化锆陶瓷固定部分假牙的三年临床表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Objective To compare the 3‐year survival and success rates of monolithic (M) and partially veneered (PV) zirconia‐fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Materials and Methods Sixty‐seven FPDs ( n =?33?M‐FPDs; n =?34 PV‐FPDs) were placed in 51 patients ( n =?23 males; mean age 61.5 years) and clinically followed up 1 week, 6 months, and then yearly after placement. One hundred per cent (100%) of M‐FPDs and 70% of PV‐FPDs were located in the posterior region. Ninety‐two per cent (92%) of M‐FPDs had three units, whereas 50% of PV‐FPDs had more than three units. A facial veneer was present in 73% of the PV‐FPDs units. Survival and success were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test ( α =?.05). Results The mean observation period was 3.5 years for M‐FPDs and 3.1 years for PV‐FPDs. Most complications associated with FPDs were biological in nature. Ceramic defects occurred exclusively among PV‐FPDs. Three‐year survival was 96.7% for M‐FPDs and 93.8% for PV‐FPDs ( P =?.064). Three‐year success was 93.8% for M‐FPDs and 81.7% for PV‐FPDs ( P =?.039). Conclusions The use of both M‐FPDs and PV‐FPDs yielded clinically successful results over a mean period of 3 years. Clinical Significance By using monolithic or facially veneered zirconia, ceramic FPDs could be fabricated which showed only a minimum of technical complications over the period of investigation without sacrificing adequate esthetics.
机译:摘要目的比较单片(M)和部分胶合肼(PV)氧化锆固定部分假牙(FPD)的3年生存和成功率。在51名患者中置于51名患者(n = 23岁的情况下六十七个FPD(n =Δ33≤3.3mV-FPD)(n = 23岁;平均年龄为61.5岁),临床随访1周,6几个月,然后在安置后年度。一百百分之一(100%)的M-FPD和70%的PV-FPD位于后部区域。 92%(92%)的M-FPDS有三个单位,而50%的PV-FPD有三个以上的单位。面部贴面在73%的PV-FPDS单位中存在。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算生存和成功,并使用日志秩测试进行比较(α= 05)。结果M-FPDS的平均观察期为3.5岁,PV-FPD为3.1岁。大多数与FPD相关的并发症是生物学的。 PV-FPD中仅发生陶瓷缺陷。对于M-FPD的三年生存率为96.7%,PV-FPDS的93.8%(P = 064)。对于M-FPD的三年成功为93.8%,PV-FPDS为81.7%(P = 039)。结论M-FPDS和PV-FPD的使用产生临床成功的成功结果3年。通过使用整体或面向甲基锆的临床意义,可以制造陶瓷FPD,其在不牺牲足够美学期间,仅在调查期间显示最少的技术并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号