...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management >REVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL INPUT IN PRELIMINARY ELAS FOR COASTAL RESORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN MALAYSIA
【24h】

REVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL INPUT IN PRELIMINARY ELAS FOR COASTAL RESORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN MALAYSIA

机译:马来西亚沿海度假村开发项目初步素质生态投入述评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Malaysia, environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been mandatory since 1988 as a proactive tool in environmental management for 19 prescribed activities. Since ecological information is an important component in EIA., this study examined the quality of ecological input in 41 preliminary El As for coastal resort development. Twelve criteria relating to ecological data, impact prediction, evaluation of impact significance, mitigating measures, residual impacts, monitoring, communication of the report and consultants were reviewed. Results revealed that only 27 percent of the EIAs were found to be satisfactory, whereas the others were at borderline or poor. In describing the existing environment, the majority of the reports made no mention of the survey methods, some of the data included were found to be not site-specific and up-to-date, and the sources of the secondary data presented in these reports were mostly not quoted. There was a tendency to survey terrestrial habitats more than aquatic, and higher plants are surveyed more than animals. Most of the reports also failed to mention the species status although comprehensive lists of species were present. They also failed to quantify the species present in the impacted areas which could lead to inadequate ecological impact prediction. The study also showed that, though all the reports contained a section on ecology, not all the EIA consultants involved in preparing these reports comprised of a multidisciplinary team that has an ecologist/biologist or environmental scientist.
机译:在马来西亚,自1988年以来,环境影响评估(EIA)被强制为1988年作为19个规定活动环境管理的主动工具。由于生态信息是环境影响评估的重要组成部分。,这项研究检测了41个初步EL的生态投入质量,如沿海度假村发展。综述了与生态数据,影响预测,影响意义评估,减轻措施,剩余影响,监测,报告和顾问的沟通的十二条标准。结果表明,只有27%的欧洲统计署被发现令人满意,而其他人则在边境或穷人处。在描述现有环境时,大多数报告没有提及调查方法,发现包含的一些数据不是特定于网站和最新的,以及这些报告中呈现的次要数据的来源主要是不是引用。有一个倾向于调查陆地栖息地多,比水生,高于动物的植物。尽管存在全面的物种列表,但大多数报告也未能提及物种状态。他们还没有量化受影响区域中存在的物种,这可能导致生态影响预测不足。该研究还表明,虽然所有报告都包含了一个关于生态学的一部分,但并非所有参与制定这些报告的所有EIA顾问都包括有生态学家/生物学家或环境科学家的多学科团队。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号